Re: Segmentation fault

2012-12-11 Thread stompdagg...@yahoo.com
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:33 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:16 PM,  olivier.e.am...@gmail.com wrote: When starting openSuse 12.2, the X-server terminates with a segmentation fault (see attached log file). The open source driver should support your card just

Re: Segmentation fault

2012-12-11 Thread stompdagg...@yahoo.com
On Die, 2012-12-11 at 01:45 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:33 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:16 PM,  olivier.e.am...@gmail.com wrote: When starting openSuse 12.2, the X-server terminates with a segmentation fault (see

Re: Segmentation fault

2012-12-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2012-12-11 at 02:48 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Die, 2012-12-11 at 01:45 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:33 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:16 PM, olivier.e.am...@gmail.com wrote: When starting

Re: Segmentation fault

2012-12-11 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:48 AM, stompdagg...@yahoo.com stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Die, 2012-12-11 at 01:45 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:33 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:16 PM, olivier.e.am...@gmail.com wrote: When

Re: Segmentation fault

2012-12-11 Thread stompdagg...@yahoo.com
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:48 AM, stompdagg...@yahoo.com stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Die, 2012-12-11 at 01:45 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:33 -0800, stompdagg...@yahoo.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:16 PM,  olivier.e.am...@gmail.com wrote: When

[PATCH] ephyr: Resize without parent window

2012-12-11 Thread Daniel Martin
From: Daniel Martin daniel.mar...@secunet.com Hi, the following patch removes the resize restriction from Xephyr by adding a new option -resizeable. With that option it's possible to resize Xephyr windows without the need of an explicit parent window. Cheers, Daniel Martin (1): ephyr: Add

[PATCH] ephyr: Add -resizeable option

2012-12-11 Thread Daniel Martin
From: Daniel Martin daniel.mar...@secunet.com With this option passed, ephyr windows can be resized like normal windows on the fly, without the need of an explicit parent window. Signed-off-by: Daniel Martin daniel.mar...@secunet.com --- hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyr.c |1 +

[PATCH] xfree86: print message to the log when zapping the server

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c index 9dabf10..d8d4fad 100644 --- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c +++

Re: [PATCH v2] xf86: Fix non-PCI configuration-less setups

2012-12-11 Thread Dave Airlie
So this got merged into Fedora, and nobody reads bug reports after merging stuff to know when it breaks lots of things. } +/* + * If all of the above fails, which can happen if X was started without + * configuration or if BusID wasn't set for non-PCI devices, use the first

Re: [PATCH v2] xf86: Fix non-PCI configuration-less setups

2012-12-11 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote: So this got merged into Fedora, and nobody reads bug reports after merging stuff to know when it breaks lots of things. } +/* + * If all of the above fails, which can happen if X was started without + *

[git pull] revert + dri1 fix

2012-12-11 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Keith, the dri1 fix has gone unreviewed on the list, even by those who created the problem, but it works here and I'd rather not forget it again. The non-pci change breaks all multi-gpu setups in Fedora here, so we should drop it for now until we know what is the correct way to implement it,

[PATCH] xfree86/hotplug: cleanup properly if the screen fails to initialise

2012-12-11 Thread Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com Due to another bug, the modesetting/udl driver would fail to init properly on hotplug, when it did the code didn't clean up properly, and on removing the device the server could crash. Found in F18 testing. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com ---

[PATCH 00/29] Pointer barrier events and barrier releases

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
This is the server-side for the pointer-barrier patches, proposed as XI 2.3. It adds events for pointer barriers (when the pointer hits vs leaves the arrier) and the ability to release a pointer across. I hereby propose this for the 1.14 release. Trees for testing available from:

[PATCH 01/29] cursor: Move pointer barrier code over to XI

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net In order to send events to specific windows associated with the barrier, we need to move the code that handles barriers to somewhere where it's easier to construct and send events. Rather than duplicating XSync with its XSyncSelectAlarm, re-use the

[PATCH 02/29] barriers: Don't loop over the server to destroy a barrier

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net This is completely pointless as far as I can tell. Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 16 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/Xi/xibarriers.c b/Xi/xibarriers.c

[PATCH 03/29] barriers: Switch to an explicit hook for barrier constrainment

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net Rather than riding on the ConstrainCursorHarder hook, which has several issues, move to an explicit hook, which will help us with some RANDR interaction issues. Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 56

[PATCH 04/29] barriers: Switch to finding the nearest barrier client

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net When we add events, we eventually want to add more state to the PointerBarrierClient, so return one of these instead of the dummy public structure that's not very interesting. Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net ---

[PATCH 05/29] barriers: Reindent the constrainment hook

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net This is to make future diffs much cleaner. Best viewed with -w. Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 57 + 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 28

[PATCH 06/29] Add support for XI2.3: Pointer barrier events and releases.

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net This adds support for clients that would like to get a notification every time a barrier is hit, and allows clients to temporarily release a barrier so that pointers can go through them, without having to destroy and recreate barriers. Based on work

[PATCH 07/29] barriers: Don't allow destroying other client's barriers

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Xi/xibarriers.c b/Xi/xibarriers.c index f16094d..86e811e 100644 --- a/Xi/xibarriers.c +++ b/Xi/xibarriers.c @@ -534,6 +534,9 @@ XIDestroyPointerBarrier(ClientPtr

[PATCH 08/29] barriers: Don't allow releasing the pointer on other client's barriers

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Xi/xibarriers.c b/Xi/xibarriers.c index 86e811e..8f12253 100644 --- a/Xi/xibarriers.c +++ b/Xi/xibarriers.c @@ -591,6 +591,9 @@ ProcXIBarrierReleasePointer(ClientPtr

[PATCH 09/29] barriers: Add support for edge cases when releasing barriers

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net If we release a barrier, we want to ensure that we block all other barriers afterwards, rather than capping the limit to the two nearest barriers. Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 7 --- 1 file

[PATCH 10/29] barriers: Add a couple pixels of elbow room for the hit detection

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net Pointers (and the hands that drive them) aren't very precise, and the slightest amount of nudging to either side might be enough to reset the event ID, making clients think they have an entirely new hit. Allow for a slightly bigger hit box before

[PATCH 11/29] barriers: Increment event ID on hit box leave

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net We eventually want to send a new notify event on hitbox leave, which signifies the dawn of a new barrier event ID, so it's convenient if we can put the code here. Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 14

[PATCH 12/29] barriers: Send a BarrierLeave event when we leave the hitbox

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net Additionally, add flags when the pointer is released. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/Xi/xibarriers.c b/Xi/xibarriers.c index

[PATCH 13/29] barriers: Clean up code

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net Rename a variable. This is to make the diff in the next commit cleaner. Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Xi/xibarriers.c

[PATCH 14/29] barriers: Send an XI_BarrierLeave event when a barrier is destroyed

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net This ensures that we always complete an event sequence. Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 44 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) diff --git a/Xi/xibarriers.c

[PATCH 15/29] barriers: Replace complex intersection test with simpler math

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net Since barriers are axis-aligned, we can do the intersection test with simple interpolation rather than line-segment intersection. This also helps us out in the future when we want the barriers to extend to be rays and lines rather than just segments.

[PATCH 16/29] barriers: Support line and ray barriers

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
From: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net This allows clients to add barriers that extend to the edge of the screen. Clients are encouraged to use these instead of precise coordinates in these cases to help prevent pointer leaks. Signed-off-by: Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net ---

[PATCH 17/29] Pass the event list through to the pointer barrier code to return it

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Instead of having the pointer barrier code enqueue events separately from GetPointerEvents, pass the event list through and let it add to it. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 15 --- dix/getevents.c | 15 +++ include/input.h |

[PATCH 18/29] Xi: fill in barrier root x/y after clamping to RandR outputs

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
x/y for barrier events should contain the actual pointer position. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/xibarriers.c | 4 mi/mipointer.c | 18 +- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Xi/xibarriers.c b/Xi/xibarriers.c index

[PATCH 19/29] dix: skip delivery if it's not the right pointer barrier client

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Only deliver to the client that created the barrier, not to other clients. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- dix/events.c | 22 ++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/dix/events.c b/dix/events.c index 3282ef8..49b8bc5 100644 ---

[PATCH 20/29] dix: handle barrier events properly when converting to core/XI 1.x

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- dix/eventconvert.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/dix/eventconvert.c b/dix/eventconvert.c index bb5c8d3..47dcf8b 100644 --- a/dix/eventconvert.c +++ b/dix/eventconvert.c @@ -161,6 +161,8 @@

[PATCH 21/29] dix: ignore barrier events in FixUpEventFromWindow

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- dix/events.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/dix/events.c b/dix/events.c index 49b8bc5..c98a2de 100644 --- a/dix/events.c +++ b/dix/events.c @@ -2436,6 +2436,8 @@ FixUpEventFromWindow(SpritePtr pSprite, case

[PATCH 22/29] Xi: deliver barrier events as grabbed events where necessary

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
If the grab_window is the barrier window and the client owns the grab, deliver as normal grabbed event (respecting owner_events). Otherwise, deliver as usual. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/exevents.c | 18 +++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3

[PATCH 23/29] Xi: if the device is currently grabbed, flag the barrier event

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/exevents.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Xi/exevents.c b/Xi/exevents.c index a7ec0c4..f025dd1 100644 --- a/Xi/exevents.c +++ b/Xi/exevents.c @@ -1655,6 +1655,9 @@ ProcessBarrierEvent(InternalEvent *e,

[PATCH 24/29] mi: rename mipointer's internal event list

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Avoid name shadowing warnings, change the event list to a more specific name. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- mi/mipointer.c | 18 +- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/mi/mipointer.c b/mi/mipointer.c index 7bc0983..b8503f4

[PATCH 25/29] Require inputproto 2.2.99.1

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 38ac240..ee0fa78 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ XPROTO=xproto = 7.0.22

[PATCH 26/29] tests/xi2: at protocol conversion test for barrier events

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- test/xi2/protocol-eventconvert.c | 216 +++ 1 file changed, 216 insertions(+) diff --git a/test/xi2/protocol-eventconvert.c b/test/xi2/protocol-eventconvert.c index bb3177c..3957747 100644 ---

[PATCH 27/29] Xi: swap sequence number and evtype in barrier events

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/extinit.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/Xi/extinit.c b/Xi/extinit.c index 175d89b..606d61c 100644 --- a/Xi/extinit.c +++ b/Xi/extinit.c @@ -847,7 +847,9 @@ SBarrierEvent(xXIBarrierEvent * from,

[PATCH 28/29] Xi: fix swapping for barrier events

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Protocol events don't contain pointers, so it's easier to copy everything over, then swap in-place. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/extinit.c | 45 + 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 29/29] dix: don't copy the wrong event mask when activating a passive grab

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
GrabMask is a union of core, XI1 and XI2 masks. If a XI2 grab is activated, the value is a random pointer value, using it as mask has unpredictable effects. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- dix/grabs.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff

[PULL] input fixes, mostly unreviewed

2012-12-11 Thread Peter Hutterer
Fixes inconsistent touch event selection, a stack smash on some touch devices and re-fixes 28808 after that came back recently. The following changes since commit b51a1bd2766e7dc975ca8f1cacc3f8bd0e1a68a3: Merge remote-tracking branch 'whot/for-keith' (2012-11-30 09:31:46 -0800) are available

[Bug 58119] New: EQ overflow when running glxgears in fullscreen mode

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58119 Priority: medium Bug ID: 58119 Assignee: xorg-driver-ati@lists.x.org Summary: EQ overflow when running glxgears in fullscreen mode QA Contact: xorg-t...@lists.x.org Severity: normal

Re: glxgears frame rate when DPMS is in off state

2012-12-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 13:12 -0600, Ilija Hadzic wrote: Clearly, the behavior that we have now is wrong from the power-savings perspective (i.e., it completely defeats the purpose of DPMS), Not sure I agree with this statement, given DPMS stands for *Display* Power Management Signaling, but

[Bug 58119] EQ overflow when running glxgears in fullscreen mode

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58119 --- Comment #1 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net --- Please attach files here directly rather than referencing external sites whenever possible. Please also attach the dmesg output, preferably captured after the problem occurred. -- You

[Bug 58119] EQ overflow when running glxgears in fullscreen mode

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58119 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Mityukov mityu...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 71318 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=71318action=edit Xorg.0.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 58119] EQ overflow when running glxgears in fullscreen mode

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58119 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Mityukov mityu...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 71320 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=71320action=edit Xorg.0.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 58119] EQ overflow when running glxgears in fullscreen mode

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58119 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Mityukov mityu...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 71321 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=71321action=edit dmesg output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 58119] EQ overflow when running glxgears in fullscreen mode

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58119 Vladimir Mityukov mityu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #71318|Xorg.0.log |dmesg

Bug#695594: xserver-xorg-video-radeon: X segfaults when entering OpenGL mode in Minecraft

2012-12-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
reassign 695594 libgl1-mesa-dri kthxbye On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 10:06 -0500, The Wanderer wrote: I was able to obtain a backtrace according to the instructions on the XStrikeForce/XServerDebugging page of wiki.debian.org; that is attached. It crashes in Mesa code, reassigning there. Note

[PATCH 2/3] Remove unused local variable 'path'.

2012-12-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com ../../src/radeon_probe.c: In function 'radeon_platform_probe': ../../src/radeon_probe.c:270:11: error: unused variable 'path' [-Werror=unused-variable] Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com --- src/radeon_probe.c |1 - 1 file

[PATCH 1/3] Remove dead code flagged by gcc -Wunused-but-set-variable.

2012-12-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com --- src/drmmode_display.c |2 -- src/evergreen_textured_videofuncs.c | 12 src/r600_textured_videofuncs.c | 12 src/radeon_textured_videofuncs.c

[PATCH 3/3] Fix logic error in radeon_kms_update_vram_limit().

2012-12-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com Pointed out by clang: ../../src/radeon_kms.c:1562:6: warning: variable 'total_size_bytes' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] total_size_bytes += (64 * 4 * 64); ^~~~ ../../src/radeon_kms.c:1557:25:

[PATCH v2] Remove local variables total_size_bytes.

2012-12-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com Not actually used for anything. Refactoring gone wrong? Also remove a comment that doesn't seem to make sense anymore. Stumbled over this due to a warning by clang: ../../src/radeon_kms.c:1562:6: warning: variable 'total_size_bytes' is uninitialized

[Bug 57990] xf86-video-ati Causes black stripes (RadeonHD4890 - r770)

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57990 --- Comment #13 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net --- (In reply to comment #13) Before this didn't happen, it's a new bug. It didn't happen before what? It would be great if you could isolate which component (kernel, xf86-video-ati, mesa)

[Bug 57995] Random hard lockups on my HP pavillion laptop using the radeon r200 driver

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57995 --- Comment #4 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net --- (In reply to comment #4) 1. I'm always in X 2. I have a window that extends or is moved offscreen to the left. 3. I move the mouse offscreen to the left. Hmm, if it only happens when

[Bug 58115] AMD LLANO repeated gpu lockups adn softresets

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #6 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net --- (In reply to comment #6) attempt to enable the all three panels (This should not be allowed to work but it passes even though it should fail ) Why should it fail? restart pc attempt

[Bug 57990] xf86-video-ati Causes black stripes (RadeonHD4890 - r770)

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57990 --- Comment #14 from Rubén Reina ruben.reina@gmail.com --- I was using an older version of the driver, this problem appeared when I installed version 1:7.0.0+git1212071424.793e1b (xserver-xorg-video-ati). I was working with mesa 9.1 without

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove dead code flagged by gcc -Wunused-but-set-variable.

2012-12-11 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote: From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com For the series and your v2 patch: Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher aleander.deuc...@amd.com --- src/drmmode_display.c

[Bug 57990] xf86-video-ati Causes black stripes (RadeonHD4890 - r770)

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57990 --- Comment #15 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net --- (In reply to comment #14) I was using an older version of the driver, this problem appeared when I installed version 1:7.0.0+git1212071424.793e1b (xserver-xorg-video-ati). What was the

[Bug 58115] AMD LLANO repeated gpu lockups adn softresets

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #7 from Kenney Phillis Jr kphilli...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #6) attempt to enable the all three panels (This should not be allowed to work but it passes even though it should fail ) Why

[Bug 57995] Random hard lockups on my HP pavillion laptop using the radeon r200 driver

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57995 --- Comment #5 from David Ronis david.ro...@mcgill.ca --- I'll turn composting on when I get home. I the mean time, someone wrote me (strange that it didn't appear here as well), who was having similar problems and suggested that I turn AccelDFS

[Bug 58115] AMD LLANO repeated gpu lockups adn softresets

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #8 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com --- (In reply to comment #7) The hardware doesn't support it... Even when I enabled the third display and used all three at once only two displays had output... In my case the following

[Bug 57990] xf86-video-ati Causes black stripes (RadeonHD4890 - r770)

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57990 --- Comment #16 from Rubén Reina ruben.reina@gmail.com --- The older version was the version that comes installed with Ubuntu 12.04 by default (don't know how to see it). I can't disable ColorTiling2D because I don't have xorg.conf file in my

[Bug 57990] xf86-video-ati Causes black stripes (RadeonHD4890 - r770)

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57990 --- Comment #17 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com --- (In reply to comment #16) The older version was the version that comes installed with Ubuntu 12.04 by default (don't know how to see it). I can't disable ColorTiling2D because I don't have

[Bug 57990] xf86-video-ati Causes black stripes (RadeonHD4890 - r770)

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57990 --- Comment #18 from Rubén Reina ruben.reina@gmail.com --- Thank you very much, I'll create that xorg.conf and I'll tell you if that works. I'm outside home now but in two days I'll do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 58115] AMD LLANO repeated gpu lockups adn softresets

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #9 from Kenney Phillis Jr kphilli...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 71359 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=71359action=edit Xrandr verbose output ( radeon driver ) Xorg version:

[Bug 58115] AMD LLANO repeated gpu lockups adn softresets

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #10 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com --- Can you list the exact commands you are using? I can't reproduce this here. I have a APU laptop with VGA-0, HDMI-0, and LVDS and I get the expected behavior: $ xrandr --output HDMI-0 --auto

[Bug 58115] AMD LLANO repeated gpu lockups adn softresets

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #11 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com --- Do you still have the GPU resets when you disable acceleration? Option NoAccel true in the device section of your xorg.conf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Bug 58115] AMD LLANO repeated gpu lockups and softresets

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 Kenney Phillis Jr kphilli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|AMD LLANO repeated gpu |AMD LLANO

[Bug 58115] AMD LLANO repeated gpu lockups and softresets

2012-12-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #12 from Kenney Phillis Jr kphilli...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 71371 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=71371action=edit xrandr tests -- radeon driver it appears the problem is user space... xrandr command