Dnia poniedziałek, 5 listopada 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
[...]
> Observation:
> you're running 1600x1200@85Hz while basic Single Link DVI has it's
> maximum at 1600x1200@60Hz
>
> To run higher resolutions or frequency, the entire chain has to support
> reduced blanking capabilities and there's
Dnia wtorek, 6 listopada 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
> On Montag, 5. November 2012 23:42:21 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> > But in fact my monitor IS connected via a standard VGA
> > connector. It simply has no DVI plug, only VGA. My graphics card
> > has a single output connector and a splitter, w
On Montag, 5. November 2012 23:42:21 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> But in fact my monitor IS connected via a standard VGA
> connector. It simply has no DVI plug, only VGA. My graphics card
> has a single output connector and a splitter, which allows me to
> connect two monitors, both using VGA co
Dnia poniedziałek, 5 listopada 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
[...]
> Since there's also no relation to the compositor or the ARGB state of the
> window, yet the problem is (is it?) restricted to konsole, i'm out of
> ideas.
I've taken a closer look and its not only console that looks bad. I think
On Montag, 5. November 2012 11:19:00 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> $ xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1600 x 1200, maximum 8192 x 8192
> DVI-I-1 connected 1600x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right x
> axis y axis) 352mm x 264mm
>1600x1200 85.0*+ 75.0 70.0 65.0 60
Dnia środa, 31 października 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
[...]
> Back on topic:
> --> Did you have a chance to check the ARGB/Compositing relation then?
No relation. As I've mentioned in another post, I think it has something to
do with font renderere, which works in 1280x1024 mode, while the sc
Dnia czwartek, 1 listopada 2012, Henrik Pauli napisał:
[...]
> > Check "xrandr -q" for supported modes, outputs and current mode and
> > use "xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --mode 1600x1200 --scale 1x1" to set it
> >
> > This blurring would however impact absolutely everything, every font
> > in every wi
So, I'm at my office and I'm ready to check everything which may help us
solve this problem. First, here is the output of xrandr:
$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1600 x 1200, maximum 8192 x 8192
DVI-I-1 connected 1600x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
352mm x 264m
On 2012-11-01 18:54, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 16:45:21 CEST, Henrik Pauli wrote:
>> --scale has nothing to do with the final scaling
> if i run "xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --scale 2x2" here, i get "doubled"
> resolution (no panning)
Yeah, but that probably wasn't the p
On Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 16:45:21 CEST, Henrik Pauli wrote:
> --scale has nothing to do with the final scaling
if i run "xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --scale 2x2" here, i get "doubled" resolution
(no panning)
For
xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --set "scaling mode" "Full aspect"
I just get an error (s
On 2012-10-31 11:44, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 08:25:12 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
>> Dnia wtorek, 30 października 2012, Mark Wagner napisał: [...]
>>> The driver probably thinks you're running an LCD, and is scaling
>>> the image to what it assumes is the native resoluti
On Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 14:44:27 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> Output definitely is 1600x1200. Here are some lines from Xorg.0.log:
>
> [77.187] (II) NOUVEAU(0): Output DVI-I-1 connected
> [77.187] (II) NOUVEAU(0): Output DVI-I-2 disconnected
> [77.187] (II) NOUVEAU(0): Using user
On Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 08:25:12 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 30 października 2012, Mark Wagner napisał:
> [...]
>> The driver probably thinks you're running an LCD, and is scaling the
>> image to what it assumes is the native resolution. Try setting the
>> driver to let the moni
Dnia środa, 31 października 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
> On Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 08:25:12 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
[...]
> > I think that the driver sets the resolution to 1280x1024
>
> checking is better then "thinking" ;-)
>
> > (I wish I could change it to 1600x1200, which is the des
Dnia wtorek, 30 października 2012, Mark Wagner napisał:
[...]
> The driver probably thinks you're running an LCD, and is scaling the
> image to what it assumes is the native resolution. Try setting the
> driver to let the monitor perform scaling, or try changing your
> display resolution slightly
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> I've given a try to latest nouveau driver on my Dell T5400 workstation with
> NVidia G86 (Quadro NVS 290). I'm using a Samsung SyncMaster 959NF CRT
> screen.
> At the first glance, one may say, that the first one is blurry becouse of
> hands
Dnia poniedziałek, 29 października 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
[...]
> If it was on nvidia only i'd btw. guess you've FXAA enabled, but the way
> it is, it actually will rather be a bug in either nouveau or kwin. We
> however got to figure "where".
Thanks for your reply. I suppose, i'll work on
On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012 12:57:37 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> I've given a try to latest nouveau driver on my Dell T5400
> workstation with NVidia G86 (Quadro NVS 290). I'm using a
> Samsung SyncMaster 959NF CRT screen.
>
> Almost everything works well. Almost, becouse fonts in terminal
> are
I've given a try to latest nouveau driver on my Dell T5400 workstation with
NVidia G86 (Quadro NVS 290). I'm using a Samsung SyncMaster 959NF CRT
screen.
Almost everything works well. Almost, becouse fonts in terminal are rendered
in unacceptable way. But... it is kind of strange.
To show you
19 matches
Mail list logo
