On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 01:39 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:54 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net
snip
I wonder if
Without the fix xkbcomp may leave a truncated file in the filesystem
if there is not enough disk space. Using the truncated file leads to
problems.
Signed-off-by: Rami Ylimaki ext-rami.ylim...@nokia.com
---
xkbcomp.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
Peter Hutterer wrote:
Sorry for the late answer. Having thought about this again I agree with you
- grabbing a slave device through an XI2 grab should detach the device.
This guarantees a client exclusive access to the device - one of the two
main reasons why a grab is useful.
I'll revert
- Create a few seperate functions and a few private function pointers.
- Replace a few if conditions with a check for pExaPix-pDamage instead.
- This is in preperation of a third scheme that lies somewhere in between.
- Code clarity would have suffered (i started working on it and didn't like the
- This is most useful for cases where the first operation is a hardware
rendered one.
---
exa/exa_migration_mixed.c | 50 ++--
exa/exa_mixed.c | 27 +++-
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
- This can be used to force creation of driver pixmap.
- Not for 1 or 4 bpp.
- Driver can still fail (driver) pixmap creation.
---
exa/exa.c | 32
exa/exa.h |2 +-
exa/exa_migration_classic.c |4 ++--
---
exa/exa.c | 12 +++-
exa/exa_migration_mixed.c |4
exa/exa_mixed.c | 11 ++-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/exa/exa.c b/exa/exa.c
index 32a1c3e..5b473c9 100644
--- a/exa/exa.c
+++ b/exa/exa.c
@@ -333,8
2009/8/5 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 01:39 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:54 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer
From: Tiago Vignatti tiago.vigna...@nokia.com
Fix indentation caused by the last commit. Also fix indentation in another two
unrelated chunks.
mieq.c looks indented-wise now. Let's see how long it will take to someone
mess it again.
Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti tiago.vigna...@nokia.com
---
Ooops, I messed the script. Well, the email is mine :)
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 08:18:55PM +0200, y...@mail.nokia.com wrote:
From: Tiago Vignatti tiago.vigna...@nokia.com
The server was processing ET_RawMotion type when the cursor was wrapping to
another screen and getting wrong valuator
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:36:24PM +0200, Simon Thum wrote:
Peter Hutterer wrote:
Sorry for the late answer. Having thought about this again I agree with you
- grabbing a slave device through an XI2 grab should detach the device.
This guarantees a client exclusive access to the device - one
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 09:18:55PM +0300, y...@mgw-mx09.nokia.com wrote:
From: Tiago Vignatti tiago.vigna...@nokia.com
The server was processing ET_RawMotion type when the cursor was wrapping to
another screen and getting wrong valuator values. This fix such issue
considering only ET_Motion,
12 matches
Mail list logo
