Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Henrik Rydberg
Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 01:10:24AM -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/02/10 05:59, Henrik Rydberg wrote: >>> Peter Hutterer wrote: >>> [...] It'd be interesting to see how much work it is to have this API _repla

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Henrik Rydberg
Chase Douglas wrote: [...] > Going with my above view on the magic mouse, I don't see using DIDs for > the it. Passing the touches as valuators stacked on the relative pointer > valuators seems like the best approach to me. > >> - Enter/Leave events are used to determine where pointer is currently

Re: [PATCH] Increase advertised RENDER protocol minor version to 11

2010-07-05 Thread Jamey Sharp
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 08:23:09PM -0400, Robert Hooker wrote: >> Support for the blend mode operators was added in >> 0ce42adbf4cff9e7f049d9fc79d588ece5936177 >> and the requirement was bumped but when things were split off into >> include/p

Re: [PATCH] XAA: Verify "pixmap" ops are really called on pixmaps before reading privates.

2010-07-05 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 03:13:20PM +0200, ext Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Mon, Jul  5, 2010 at 16:05:55 +0300, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) >> wrote: >> >> > We'd need to port these remaining drivers to EXA then. >>

Re: [RFC] xserver: Masked valuators, DIDs, and ABS_MT_SLOT

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:49:32PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:34 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:15:42PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:04 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:36:18PM -040

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 10:36:20PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:33 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:09:48PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > > > I hacked some more today, and I'm not sure we need a separate XI2 event > > > type. I'm going to send ou

request for help - evdev third-button emulation

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
Just idling along, looking for something to do? There's a low-hanging fruit that I've had on my todo list for ages but never found the time for: third-mouse button emulation in evdev. What I eventually want is: if the emulation is enabled, a non-moving touch emits a right mouse click instead of a

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Chase Douglas
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:33 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:09:48PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > > I hacked some more today, and I'm not sure we need a separate XI2 event > > type. I'm going to send out another RFC "pull request" with the work > > soon, but as an overview

Re: [PATCH] Increase advertised RENDER protocol minor version to 11

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 08:23:09PM -0400, Robert Hooker wrote: > Support for the blend mode operators was added in > 0ce42adbf4cff9e7f049d9fc79d588ece5936177 > and the requirement was bumped but when things were split off into > include/protocol-versions.h it defined it to 10. render uses > the low

Re: [PATCH video-chips 1/3] config: remove ISA bus code, as support is removed from xserver

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:07:06PM -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 14:54 +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > > > understand so much the reason for that). So "remove ISA bus code, as > > support > > is removed from xserver" is not the argument. > > Agreed > > > > > On the other ha

Re: [RFC] xserver: Masked valuators, DIDs, and ABS_MT_SLOT

2010-07-05 Thread Chase Douglas
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:34 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:15:42PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:04 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:36:18PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > > > > Add extra functions for masked va

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:55:25PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > If you fix tk to understand multitouch (at least to translate MT events > into a single pointer), then you should be able to just drop the new tk > dynamic library onto your system and everything should work. > > If they statically b

Re: [RFC] xserver: Masked valuators, DIDs, and ABS_MT_SLOT

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:15:42PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:04 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:36:18PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > > > Add extra functions for masked valuator input API > > > > yes, but no :) > > idea is right, imple

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:09:48PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > > This is a good start. Eventually, we should have DIDs exposed as a new > > device class on the protocol though. Likewise, I don't think ET_DM > > should not be converted to normal XIDeviceEvents but rather to their own > > type t

Re: [RFC] xserver: Masked valuators, DIDs, and ABS_MT_SLOT

2010-07-05 Thread Chase Douglas
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:04 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:36:18PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > > Add extra functions for masked valuator input API > > yes, but no :) > idea is right, implementation needs work. Please send this as a patch for > better comments. Mo

Re: [RFC] xserver: Masked valuators, DIDs, and ABS_MT_SLOT

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 06:36:18PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > The following changes since commit a71dbc03e65cf7b0654a6eca93ce0bf6a1711ffa: > > Bump to version 1.8.99.904 (1.9 RC4) (2010-07-01 08:27:05 -0400) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://kernel.ubuntu.com/cndougla/xse

Re: [RFC v2] xf86-input-evdev: Slotted MT events and mixed mode devices

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 08:39:46PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 10:11 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > ok, I give up with copy/paste, please send this one to the list as well. > > well, all of them please once you've fixed them up. Benjamin's valuator > > properties patch is

Re: [RFC v2] xf86-input-evdev: Slotted MT events and mixed mode devices

2010-07-05 Thread Chase Douglas
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 10:11 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > ok, I give up with copy/paste, please send this one to the list as well. > well, all of them please once you've fixed them up. Benjamin's valuator > properties patch is fine, please don't modify this one anymore. Will do. Generally, I did

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 09:13:24AM +0200, Simon Thum wrote: > Am 02.07.2010 11:36, schrieb Peter Hutterer: > > It'd be interesting to see how much work it is to have this API > > _replace_ the current API. Gives us more exposure and better testing. > > Note that I have some more API changes planned

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 01:10:24AM -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/02/10 05:59, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > > Peter Hutterer wrote: > > [...] > >> It'd be interesting to see how much work it is to have this API > >> _replace_ the current API. Gives

Re: [RFC] xserver: Masked valuators, DIDs, and ABS_MT_SLOT

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 03:02:07PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > Hi Chase, > [...] > >> The rangeToMask allocates memory in the inner event loop... > >> > >> The whole mapping construction seems a bit backwards. If unused valuators > >> are > >> never referenced, there is no need to do all those

Re: [RFC v2] xserver: Masked valuators, mixed modes, DIDs, and ABS_MT_SLOT

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 01:38:53PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > Changes since v1: > * Many fixes found through further review > * Redo rangeToMask translation for ranged event APIs > - No longer allocates memory except a bitmask (6 bytes) on the stack > * Add support for per-axis valuator modes

Re: [RFC v2] xf86-input-evdev: Slotted MT events and mixed mode devices

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 01:39:14PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote: > Changes from v1: > * A few small bug fixes > * Make mtdev configure detection automatic by default > * Rename mtdevPtr to mtdev > * Split out mtdev open and close to separate functions > * Some coding style fixes please send patches

Re: [PATCH video-chips 1/3] config: remove ISA bus code, as support is removed from xserver

2010-07-05 Thread Gaetan Nadon
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 14:54 +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > understand so much the reason for that). So "remove ISA bus code, as > support > is removed from xserver" is not the argument. Agreed > > On the other hand, we don't have a policy defined to deprecate a given > functionality of a drive

[PATCH 3/3] dix: purge leftover manual key down bit setting.

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- dix/events.c | 12 +++- hw/dmx/input/atKeynames.h |2 -- hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyr.c|8 +--- hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c |4 +--- hw/xnest/Keyboard.c|8 +--- hw/xwin/winkeynames.h

[PATCH 2/3] dix: add aux. functions for button_is_down, set_button_down, set_button_up.

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
Same as the matching key functions. Buttons, like keys, can have two states for down/up - one posted, one processed. Posted is set during event generation (usually in the signal handler). Processed is set during event processing when the event queue is emptied and events are being delivered to the

[PATCH 1/3] dix: use BitIsOn/SetBit/ClearBit macros for set_key_down helpers.

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- dix/getevents.c | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/dix/getevents.c b/dix/getevents.c index 2eacdfe..1d505e5 100644 --- a/dix/getevents.c +++ b/dix/getevents.c @@ -94,18 +94,18 @@ void set_key_down(DeviceIntPtr pDe

[PATCH] fbdev: fix devPrivates and do not disable xrandr when rotated

2010-07-05 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
FBDevDGAInit is already converted to devPrivates,and so it works fine when xf86-video-fbdev is rotated(trough xorg.conf,for instance CW rotation) But when it's not rotated,drivers like xf86-input-tslib which access the dev private screen key fail with: privates.h:122: dixGetPrivateAddr: Asser

[PATCH] fix dev private when rotated

2010-07-05 Thread Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
hi, I've a patch for fing an issue which makes rotation unusable with xf86-video-fbdev and xf86-input-tslib. Note that I'm really an xorg newbee and I know nothing about xorg, so I'm not shure if that patch would be considered a hack or not. Denis ___

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Chase Douglas
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 14:30 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: > On 07/05/2010 02:06 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:48 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: > >> On 07/05/2010 01:31 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: > >>> Heh, I feel like we're returning to the conversation I had with Peter > >>> about lega

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Mohamed Ikbel Boulabiar
I agree that providing a tool (or a middleware) for gesture and other event arbiter/generator is more important in the current phase. Applications take too much time to be updated (if so.) and companies should be convinced of the usefulness of the new apis before using them. Instead of waiting for

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Rafi Rubin
On 07/05/2010 02:06 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:48 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: On 07/05/2010 01:31 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:20 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: On 07/05/2010 12:54 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: The reason we can't pass DIDs as XI1 events is becau

[PATCH libXfont] Fix build with --disable-builtins

2010-07-05 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
--- src/util/miscutil.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/util/miscutil.c b/src/util/miscutil.c index 1e76b4b..b587b3a 100644 --- a/src/util/miscutil.c +++ b/src/util/miscutil.c @@ -54,8 +54,12 @@ weak long serverGeneration = 1; weak void register_fp

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Chase Douglas
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:48 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: > On 07/05/2010 01:31 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:20 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: > >> On 07/05/2010 12:54 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: > >>> The reason we can't pass DIDs as XI1 events is because an XI1 client > >>> also doesn'

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Rafi Rubin
On 07/05/2010 01:31 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:20 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: On 07/05/2010 12:54 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:26 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: Just one small point, if you do make these DIDs look more pointer nodes, and we can come up with

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Chase Douglas
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:20 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: > On 07/05/2010 12:54 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:26 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: > Just one small point, if you do make these DIDs look more pointer nodes, > and we > can come up with some way to associate t

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Rafi Rubin
On 07/05/2010 12:54 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:26 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: Just one small point, if you do make these DIDs look more pointer nodes, and we can come up with some way to associate them with a more classical device, I'd like to see the magic mouse and others a

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Chase Douglas
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:26 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: > >> Just one small point, if you do make these DIDs look more pointer nodes, > >> and we > >> can come up with some way to associate them with a more classical device, > >> I'd > >> like to see the magic mouse and others also abandon valuators

Re: New approach to multitouch using DIDs and bitmasked events

2010-07-05 Thread Rafi Rubin
On 07/03/2010 02:07 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 00:57 -0400, Rafi Rubin wrote: I think its clear that valuators are an extremely limited solution that just can't scale, certainly not without breaking up a device into multiple virtual devices each with a reasonable number of co

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.8.99.904

2010-07-05 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) wrote: > Something close from this is those bugs that show the dependency tree for some > particular release, like this: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=27592&hide_resolved=1 > > I quickly tried to search for the previous releases but I f

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.8.99.904

2010-07-05 Thread Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:27:40PM +0200, ext Jamey Sharp wrote: > > I was curious about the pace of progress in the X server over time: > > from 1.1.0, > ->1.2.0: 8 months, 572 commits, (+) 66868, (-) 110218, in 1891 files > ->1.3.0.0: 3 months, 151 commits, (+) 14694, (-) 1667, in 100

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.8.99.904

2010-07-05 Thread Jamey Sharp
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > - 39% of changeset represents contributors not affiliated with any company >  (gitdm -u). Worth to note that Jamey and Mikhail made a huge amount of >  contribution and I counted as "not affiliated" - probably wrong. For the record, while I

Re: [PATCH] Increase advertised RENDER protocol minor version to 11

2010-07-05 Thread Robert Hooker
Ping. any comments on this one? I have verified it correctly uses minor version 11 now via protocol tracing with xtruss With this patch: RenderQueryVersion(client-major-version=0, client-minor-version=11) = ... RenderQueryVersion(client-major-version=0, client-minor-version=11) = {major-version=

Re: [PATCH] server: Clean up VGA Arbiter macros.

2010-07-05 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:43:47PM +0300, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 03:29:53PM +0200, ext Matthieu Herrb wrote: > > > > I would like to see at least the macro to inline functions part > > (patches 1-3 of your series) go in. > > Nice. Can I considerer you

Re: [PATCH] server: Clean up VGA Arbiter macros.

2010-07-05 Thread Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 03:29:53PM +0200, ext Matthieu Herrb wrote: > > I would like to see at least the macro to inline functions part > (patches 1-3 of your series) go in. Nice. Can I considerer your reviewed-by on those then? > But I can live without them. I've a bunch of other local changes

Re: [PATCH] server: Clean up VGA Arbiter macros.

2010-07-05 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:05:28PM +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:18:21PM +0200, ext Matthieu Herrb wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 11:45:46AM +0200, Jamey Sharp wrote: > > > IIRC, Tiago also posted some patch to clean up these macros, and I > > > think I like

Re: [PATCH] XAA: Verify "pixmap" ops are really called on pixmaps before reading privates.

2010-07-05 Thread Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 03:13:20PM +0200, ext Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 16:05:55 +0300, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) > wrote: > > > We'd need to port these remaining drivers to EXA then. > > > And you know very well that's not going to happen, so meh. Not true. Our d

Re: Disabling XACE Extension (and other code build) by default

2010-07-05 Thread Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 10:25:34PM +0200, ext Eamon Walsh wrote: > On 06/21/2010 09:52 AM, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > > > > Last I remember, we want all possible build options set as on by default > > just > > to be sure the code they enable still being able to build after general > > changes. Is tha

Re: [PATCH] XAA: Verify "pixmap" ops are really called on pixmaps before reading privates.

2010-07-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 16:05:55 +0300, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki) wrote: > We'd need to port these remaining drivers to EXA then. > And you know very well that's not going to happen, so meh. Cheers, Julien ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org de

Re: [PATCH] dix: treat flags as flags, not as value in key_is_down.

2010-07-05 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:18:34PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > Fixes Xlib13 XSetModifierMapping 6/8. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org develo

Re: [PATCH] Xi: use set_key_up/down instead of manual bit handling.

2010-07-05 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 05:10:44PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > We have the wrappers, use them. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer Want to add and use button equivalents for completeness, and then get rid of kptr? :) Cheers, Daniel signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___

Re: [PATCH] XAA: Verify "pixmap" ops are really called on pixmaps before reading privates.

2010-07-05 Thread Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:41:58PM +0200, ext Jamey Sharp wrote: > > Still tempting to submit a different patch to > delete XAA entirely though. :O I was thinking about that either. I don't think there's some serious driver using it. We'd need to port these remaining drivers to EXA then.

Re: [PATCH] XAA: Verify "pixmap" ops are really called on pixmaps before reading privates.

2010-07-05 Thread Jamey Sharp
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 05:44:40PM +0200, ext Jamey Sharp wrote: >> The pixmap ops certainly are used for pixmaps (if they aren't >> offscreen), but they're also used for windows when this screen doesn't >> have the VT semaphore. I assume tha

Re: [PATCH] Initialize dev privates before using any

2010-07-05 Thread Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:55:01PM +0200, ext Keith Packard wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 16:42:38 +0300, Tiago Vignatti > wrote: > > > 1 PIXMAPs still allocated at reset > > PIXMAP: 1 objects of 40 bytes = 40 total bytes 0 private allocs > > > TOTAL: 1 objects, 40 bytes, 0 allocs > > > > I don't

Re: [PATCH] XAA: Verify "pixmap" ops are really called on pixmaps before reading privates.

2010-07-05 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Jamey, On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 05:44:40PM +0200, ext Jamey Sharp wrote: > The pixmap ops certainly are used for pixmaps (if they aren't > offscreen), but they're also used for windows when this screen doesn't > have the VT semaphore. I assume that could lead to an privates assertion > failure in x

Re: [PATCH video-chips 1/3] config: remove ISA bus code, as support is removed from xserver

2010-07-05 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Hi, On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:10:50PM +0200, ext Gaetan Nadon wrote: > Remove declaration check and AM conditional HAVE_ISA along > with the code conditionnaly included. > > Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadon People still building new drivers using old servers (and I honestly don't understand so much

Re: [PATCH] hw/xfree86/vgahw: ANSI-ify some KNR functions.

2010-07-05 Thread Tiago Vignatti
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 03:26:41AM +0200, ext Jesse Adkins wrote: > On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 08:35:00PM -0700, Jesse Adkins wrote: > > > I found this bit of K&R after wandering around xfree86 for a while. It's a > > step in the right direction. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Adkins > > > > --- >

Re: [PATCH] server: Clean up VGA Arbiter macros.

2010-07-05 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Hi, On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 12:18:21PM +0200, ext Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 11:45:46AM +0200, Jamey Sharp wrote: > > IIRC, Tiago also posted some patch to clean up these macros, and I > > think I liked that one better. I believe it turned them into inline > > functions and ki

Re: [PATCH] mi: rename miPointerMoved to miPointerMoveNoEvent.

2010-07-05 Thread Tiago Vignatti
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:31:19AM +0200, ext Peter Hutterer wrote: > Having miPointerMove and miPointerMoved is confusing, especially since both > do the same thing bar the event delivery. Also, miPointerMove calls > miPointerMoved which indicates some confusion in the temporal alignment of > caus

Re: Question about X server abort

2010-07-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
[ Please always keep the list in CC ] On Fre, 2010-07-02 at 14:05 +0800, 邓逸昕 wrote: > OK. I will give the error bt ,pixmap call log Thanks, this helps. > Breakpoint 2, exaFinishAccess (pDrawable=0x865d880, index=-1) at > exa.c:420 > 420 EXA_FatalErrorDebugWithRet(("EXA bug: FinishA

Re: Problem with exaModifyPixmapHeader_classic?

2010-07-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
Sorry for the late followup, been busy. On Mit, 2010-05-19 at 13:57 +0800, april wrote: > > |<- DRM > ->| > -- > | onscreen | EXA offscree

RE: Xserver: sys_ptr & fb_ptr question

2010-07-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fre, 2010-07-02 at 09:27 +0800, Cui, Hunk wrote: > Hi, Michel, > > [Cui, Hunk] Please see below, > >>On Don, 2010-07-01 at 13:32 +0800, Cui, Hunk wrote: > >> > >>I mean your suggestion, now in our geode driver, I have modified the > >> Rotate_mem. Rotateddata has to be allocated betw

Getting the i2c interface from randr

2010-07-05 Thread Richard Hughes
I'm trying to do two things: * Control the brightness of the external panel using DDC/CI * Update the pre and post LUTs on a 30bit external panel, using i2c I fully appreciate that different monitors have different quirks for the i2c command interface. Some of these can be auto-detected and worke

Re: Mesa in git master fails to build

2010-07-05 Thread Richard Hughes
2010/7/5 Michel Dänzer : > Looks like your > src/gallium/state_trackers/egl/depend (and possibly other depend files) > has a stale reference to it, remove it/them and try again. Works perfectly, thanks. Richard. ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org develop

[PATCH] dix: treat flags as flags, not as value in key_is_down.

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
Fixes Xlib13 XSetModifierMapping 6/8. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- dix/getevents.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/dix/getevents.c b/dix/getevents.c index f9d65e9..2eacdfe 100644 --- a/dix/getevents.c +++ b/dix/getevents.c @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ key_is

FW: [Xorg-driver-geode] [PATCH 1/5] Correctly calculatethe rendering region with the mask picture

2010-07-05 Thread Huang, FrankR
-Original Message- From: Huang, FrankR Sent: 2010年7月5日 14:53 To: 'Mart Raudsepp' Cc: xorg-driver-ge...@lists.x.org Subject: RE: [Xorg-driver-geode] [PATCH 1/5] Correctly calculatethe rendering region with the mask picture Mart, Good review. I must say thanks for your every car

[PATCH] Xi: use set_key_up/down instead of manual bit handling.

2010-07-05 Thread Peter Hutterer
We have the wrappers, use them. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- Xi/exevents.c | 13 ++--- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Xi/exevents.c b/Xi/exevents.c index de24b4c..df13190 100644 --- a/Xi/exevents.c +++ b/Xi/exevents.c @@ -814,23 +814,22 @@ UpdateDev