[PATCH libAppleWM] simplify Makefile as per-target compilation flags are not needed

2010-07-23 Thread Gaetan Nadon
We then do not need the AM_PROG_CC_C_O to detect compiler which do not accept both -c and -o together. The macro was missing, but it will no longer be needed. This setup is only needed when the same source is compiled multiple times with different compiler options. Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadon --

Re: [PATCH video-chips] config: add AM_PROG_CC_C_O for per-target compilation flags

2010-07-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Gaetan Nadon wrote: > The use of per-target compilation flags with C sources requires > that the macro AM_PROG_CC_C_O be called from configure.ac > > If the C compiler does not accept the -c and -o options simultaneously, > define NO_MINUS_C_MINUS_O. This macro actually tests both the compiler > f

[PATCH video-chips] config: add AM_PROG_CC_C_O for per-target compilation flags

2010-07-23 Thread Gaetan Nadon
The use of per-target compilation flags with C sources requires that the macro AM_PROG_CC_C_O be called from configure.ac If the C compiler does not accept the -c and -o options simultaneously, define NO_MINUS_C_MINUS_O. This macro actually tests both the compiler found by AC_PROG_CC, and, if diff

[PATCH video-intel] simplify Makefile as per-target compilation flags are not needed

2010-07-23 Thread Gaetan Nadon
We then do not need the AM_PROG_CC_C_O to detect compiler who do not accept both -c and -o together. This setup is only needed when the same source is compiled multiple times with different compiler options. Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadon --- configure.ac |1 - src/legacy/i

Re: [PULL] Xserver doc fixes

2010-07-23 Thread Pat Kane
Tested-by: Patrick E. Kane I tested the DTrace part of the patch at http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-June/010532.html Pat --- > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Alan Coopersmith > wrote: >> No one volunteered a reviewed-by, but Gaetan did suggest improvements >> that were inc

Re: [PULL] Xserver doc fixes

2010-07-23 Thread Pat Kane
Reviewed-by: Patrick E. Kane I reviewed the DTrace part of the patch at http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-June/010532.html and for extra credit I tested the dtrace scripts. I really _like_ dtrace. Pat --- On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > No one volunt

Re: [PATCH] Correct function name in dixRegisterPrivateKey comments

2010-07-23 Thread Pat Kane
Reviewed-by: Patrick E. Kane Thanks for updating the docs and header file. Pat --- On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith > --- >  include/privates.h |    4 ++-- >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/

Re: [PATCH] Update Xserver-spec for new devPrivates API

2010-07-23 Thread Pat Kane
Reviewed-by: Patrick E. Kane Thanks for updating the docs and header file. Pat --- On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith > --- >  doc/xml/Xserver-spec.xml |  139 - >  1 files changed, 74 insertio

[PATCH] Update Xserver-spec for new devPrivates API

2010-07-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith --- doc/xml/Xserver-spec.xml | 139 - 1 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/xml/Xserver-spec.xml b/doc/xml/Xserver-spec.xml index 466b79d..c5fd191 100644 --- a/doc/xml/Xserver-spec.xml +++

[PATCH] Correct function name in dixRegisterPrivateKey comments

2010-07-23 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith --- include/privates.h |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/privates.h b/include/privates.h index 5ba9358..d3c0e13 100644 --- a/include/privates.h +++ b/include/privates.h @@ -81,10 +81,10 @@ typedef struct _DevPrivate