Re: [DOC] Re: java OutOfMemory building documentation

2010-10-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
The max heap size was set to 2G. On Oct 9, 2010, at 21:37, Matt Dew wrote: > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: >> As mentioned earlier in the thread, it fails to build without upping the >> heap... >> >> The point is that it should take NO time to build because it should

Re: [DOC] Re: java OutOfMemory building documentation

2010-10-09 Thread Matt Dew
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > As mentioned earlier in the thread, it fails to build without upping the > heap... > > The point is that it should take NO time to build because it shouldn't be > rebuilding the documentation every time. True, but when it does build, it

Re: [PATCH] docs: Remove directory prerequisites from make rules

2010-10-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston On Oct 9, 2010, at 16:00, Dan Nicholson wrote: > Make expects prerequisites to be files with valid timestamps, and > directories are treated as always being out of date. Thus, any targets > depending on directories will always be rebuilt. > > Instead, the doc rule

Re: libX11 docs compilation failure

2010-10-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2010, at 17:25, Matt Dew wrote: Plus, make install re-gens all of the docs.  The dependencies are wrong. >> >> While there's been a massive amount of work already done on the docs, >> there is still a massive amount to do.

Re: libX11 docs compilation failure

2010-10-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
On Oct 9, 2010, at 17:25, Matt Dew wrote: >>> Plus, make install re-gens all of the docs. The dependencies are wrong. > > While there's been a massive amount of work already done on the docs, > there is still a massive amount to do. I'd be shocked if people > didn't find problems at this point

Re: [DOC] Re: java OutOfMemory building documentation

2010-10-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
As mentioned earlier in the thread, it fails to build without upping the heap... The point is that it should take NO time to build because it shouldn't be rebuilding the documentation every time. On Oct 9, 2010, at 16:53, Matt Dew wrote: > Jeremy, > Does the build time go down if you up Java's

[PATCH libX11 3/3] docs: Disable fop documentation by default

2010-10-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
fop is used to generate the pdf and ps formats of the documentation. This can significantly slow down the build, especially when creating all the compose key charts. Since all the docs really only ever need to be created for the tarball, set the default to 'no', but ensure that they're built during

[PATCH macros 2/3] docs: Take optional argument to control defaults

2010-10-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
The typical default of enabling documentation if the correct tool is found is usually the right thing to do. However, some packages such as Xlib have huge amounts of documentation that really only need to be built once to put into the tarball. Allow packages to specify the default by passing an arg

[PATCH macros 1/3] docs: Use m4 to handle optional macro defaults

2010-10-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
Handling the optional documentation parameters with m4 allows the help string to correctly represent the default. Signed-off-by: Dan Nicholson --- xorg-macros.m4.in | 30 -- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/xorg-macros.m4.in b/xorg-ma

[PATCH 0/3] Disable fop by default in libX11

2010-10-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
Here's a few patches that allow fop to be used but defaulted to off in libX11. The doc macros have been updated to take an optional argument setting the default that will be used. XORG_WITH_FOP is then passed 'no' from libX11. I don't believe this strictly requires a new macro version since autoco

Re: libX11 docs compilation failure

2010-10-09 Thread Matt Dew
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2010, at 16:22, James Cloos wrote: > >> Now that the docs are in the modules they document, building from git >> has become fragile. That's exactly opposite of the goal. :) With fewer tools required, it should be less fragi

Re: [DOC] Re: java OutOfMemory building documentation

2010-10-09 Thread Matt Dew
Jeremy, Does the build time go down if you up Java's heap for fop? export FOP_OPTS='-Xmx512m Matt On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > Where did this go?  I thought I saw a patch, but it's not pushed, and now I > can't find it.  libX11 takes 2h20m to build/install on my

[PATCH] docs: Remove directory prerequisites from make rules

2010-10-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
Make expects prerequisites to be files with valid timestamps, and directories are treated as always being out of date. Thus, any targets depending on directories will always be rebuilt. Instead, the doc rules are changed to always create the target's leading directory. This should prevent the docu

Re: [PATCH xrdb] Get rid of PATHETICCPP macro

2010-10-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 20:47:35 +0400, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > This macro was undefined since 7.0. Generated by unifdef -UPATHETICCPP > > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Gusarov Reviewed-by: Julien Cristau Cheers, Julien ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org d

[PATCH xrdb] Get rid of PATHETICCPP macro

2010-10-09 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
This macro was undefined since 7.0. Generated by unifdef -UPATHETICCPP Signed-off-by: Mikhail Gusarov --- xrdb.c | 105 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) diff --git a/xrdb.c b/xrdb.c index 21005c0..3c15faa 100644

Re: [PATCH 18/18] Make action strings configurable via synclient

2010-10-09 Thread walter harms
Takashi Iwai schrieb: > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai > --- > include/synaptics-properties.h | 10 ++ > src/keymap.c | 58 ++-- > src/properties.c | 63 > > src/synaptics.c

Re: [PATCH 10/18] Add multi-touch support

2010-10-09 Thread Henrik Rydberg
On 10/08/2010 07:22 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai > --- > src/eventcomm.c| 56 +++-- > src/synaptics.c| 136 > > src/synapticsstr.h | 12 + > src/synproto.h |6 ++ > 4 files cha

Re: [PATCH 01/18] Add Clickpad support

2010-10-09 Thread Henrik Rydberg
Hi Takashi, > diff --git a/src/eventcomm.c b/src/eventcomm.c > index 85dfd09..fc5055b 100644 > --- a/src/eventcomm.c > +++ b/src/eventcomm.c > @@ -269,6 +269,12 @@ event_query_axis_ranges(InputInfoPtr pInfo) > } > > xf86Msg(X_PROBED, "%s: buttons:%s\n", pInfo->name, buf); > + > +

Re: 1.9.1 plans

2010-10-09 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Jeremy, On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 16:25:18 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > I haven't heard any planes crashing or massive electrical grid > failures since 1.9.1rc1 last wek, and I haven't seen anything > terribly urgent land on master or in the list, so my plan is to > release this as 1.9.1 ne