On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:16:28AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 01/18/11 02:02 PM, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> > Cherry pick without conflicts from master to 1.3 branch.
>
> Pushed to libX11-1.3-branch
>
> If another release was to be cut from this branch, are there other fixes
> that should b
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 03:32:54PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> There is currently no mapping between XI devices and physical devices other
> than what can be extracted by parsing the Xorg logfile. Add new property
> "Device Node" to the driver to export the open device file.
>
> The client is r
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 13:15:04 +0200, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Alan Coopersmith
> wrote:
> > I don't know how many distros are still shipping 1.3.x versions and not
> > yet moving to 1.4.x, to make a new 1.3.x release worthwhile. I finished
> > updating our pac
Hi Simon,
On Sunday 06 February 2011 14:15:55 Simon Thum wrote:
> On 02/06/2011 10:18 AM, walter harms wrote:
> > hi Simon,
> > thx for you effort, just one thing:
> > you will get more feedback when you send the patches one by one
> > in the body and not as attachment.
>
> Well, I admit sticking
On 02/06/2011 10:18 AM, walter harms wrote:
> hi Simon,
> thx for you effort, just one thing:
> you will get more feedback when you send the patches one by one
> in the body and not as attachment.
Well, I admit sticking to the workflow easiest for me, since my mailer
just inlines text attachments s
hi Simon,
thx for you effort, just one thing:
you will get more feedback when you send the patches one by one
in the body and not as attachment.
re,
wh
Am 05.02.2011 22:39, schrieb Simon Thum:
> Hi Peter,
>
> the patch series consists mainly of refactoring, no functional changes.
> The main poi
