Reviewed-by: Chris Bagwell
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> ---
> src/eventcomm.c | 104
> ---
> 1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/eventcomm.c b/s
Reviewed-by: Chris Bagwell
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> ---
> src/eventcomm.c | 97 --
> 1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/eventcomm.c b/src/e
Reviving this thread...
I like this idea, but I think we need the logic to be the other way around. We
need to have a mechanism to say that a given module only works on a set of
architectures, and skip it if the build arch isn't in that set.
ie (forgive my python as it's not my native tongue,
(Mode I'm-discovering-the-code on)
Michel Dänzer (26/03/2011):
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> The latter calls the former, let's cut the middle man and eliminate a branch
> in a hot path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
Since we have:
dixRegisterPrivateKey(&exaScreenPrivateKeyRec, PRIVATE_SCRE
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 09:28 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
>
> Dan, which justifications do you feel are incorrect? Agreed that
> accurate commit msgs are important so we'll try to clear them up.
>
>
> I think the issue has been resolved with the n
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 06:31:38 +, Matt Turner wrote:
> Oh, I didn't realize it had already been fixed.
>
> Odd that it was fixed, reviewed, and tested without another comment in
> this thread. Guess I just missed the patch.
>
The followup with patch was only on -devel.
Cheers,
Julien
On Sam, 2011-03-26 at 11:50 +, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> 2011/3/26 Michel Dänzer :
> > From: Michel Dänzer
> >
> > The latter calls the former, let's cut the middle man and eliminate a branch
> > in a hot path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
> > ---
> > exa/exa_priv.h |7 +++
>
2011/3/26 Michel Dänzer :
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> The latter calls the former, let's cut the middle man and eliminate a branch
> in a hot path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
> ---
> exa/exa_priv.h | 7 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/exa/exa_pr
From: Michel Dänzer
The latter calls the former, let's cut the middle man and eliminate a branch
in a hot path.
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
---
exa/exa_priv.h |7 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/exa/exa_priv.h b/exa/exa_priv.h
index e5d90d4..70de4bd
On Fre, 2011-03-25 at 20:41 +0200, Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti
> ---
> hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2.c |8 ++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2.c b/hw/xfree86/dri2/dri2.c
> index 9ca378f..53f1e33 100644
> --- a/hw
Hello again,
Thanks for your clarification.
I did not mean any disrespect, that came out wrong, sorry.
The problem here is that if your filter happens to return false when
the user intended to trigger it a different event is generated.
For such input to be useful the filter should be som
Hello Michal,
first of all, thanks a lot for your feedback.
I must admit though, that I get the feeling, that you did either not fully
comprehend my intention,
or else, have not read some of the latest research results on multi sensory
input evaluation?!
Maybe I just expressed myself not we
12 matches
Mail list logo
