From: Yaakov Selkowitz
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-November/027117.html
Signed-off-by: Yaakov Selkowitz
---
This should fix Cygwin. Whether or not to make this unconditional would
require further discussion.
Xfuncs.h |2 +-
Xos.h|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertion
On 11/14/11 14:24, walter harms wrote:
#ifdef XSERVER_DTRACE
- XSERVER_REQUEST_DONE(LookupMajorName(MAJOROP), MAJOROP,
+ XSERVER_REQUEST_DONE(LookupMajorName(client->majorOp),
client->majorOp,
client->sequence, client->index, result);
Am 13.11.2011 18:27, schrieb Alan Coopersmith:
> On 11/12/11 01:14, walter harms wrote:
>> Exit(-1); translates into exit(-1); (Why ?)
>> this does not work as intended. maybe 1 or EXIT_FAILURE is better
>> here.
>
> It's what the original code had and I didn't think about changing i
Ugh ... rrgh... Ok, I'll take a look at this...
On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:57, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 18:19, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> src/XpmI.h |2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> New commits:
>> commit 4cedf181bcfe13e5d206554c51edb82cb17e7ad5
>> Author: Jeremy Huddlest
Am 14.11.2011 18:04, schrieb Keith Packard:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:47:44 -0800, Jamey Sharp wrote:
>
>> And can I persuade you to just inline this directly into its only call
>> site, below, in Dispatch? I don't think factoring it out enhances
>> clarity in this case, especially since this way
Reviewed-by: Jamey Sharp
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:04:18AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:47:44 -0800, Jamey Sharp wrote:
>
> > And can I persuade you to just inline this directly into its only call
> > site, below, in Dispatch? I don't think factoring it out enhances
> >
On 11/11/2011 18:19, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> src/XpmI.h |2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> New commits:
> commit 4cedf181bcfe13e5d206554c51edb82cb17e7ad5
> Author: Jeremy Huddleston
> Date: Fri Nov 11 10:17:11 2011 -0800
>
> Include missing headers
>
> This fixes
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 23:47:43 -0700, "Pierre-Loup A. Griffais"
wrote:
> BTW, is it by design that RandR rotation sticks around across
> generations?
The whole mode is supposed to stick, in case you've swapped monitors
since starting the server. And that include rotation.
--
keith.pack...@intel
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 23:42:37 -0700, "Pierre-Loup A. Griffais"
wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] xfree86: Fix RandR rotation across server generations
Merged.
bfa2a18..a551f12 master -> master
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp0C4BZAGckp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:03:54 +1000, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> Peter Hutterer (7):
> xfree86: duplicate name and driver from pInfo for NewInputDeviceRequest
> Xi: allow passive keygrabs on the XIAll(Master)Devices fake devices
> dix: Don't let a driver without a ProximityClassRec
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:47:44 -0800, Jamey Sharp wrote:
> And can I persuade you to just inline this directly into its only call
> site, below, in Dispatch? I don't think factoring it out enhances
> clarity in this case, especially since this way you need to look up the
> major opcode in both place
Hi,
On 2011-10-21 05:46, Matt Dew wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 01:47 AM, Marko Myllynen wrote:
>> On 2011-10-18 20:15, Matt Dew wrote:
>>> On 10/17/2011 03:07 AM, Marko Myllynen wrote:
I've now tested by building patched libX11 against the updated
keysymdef.h and ezh/EZH/permille work in
Great News! We got ourselves another devroom!
We are sharing it with the openICC project, we have currently pencilled
in Xorg/Mesa/Wayland for saturday (we should be able to get the devroom
in the morning already this year!) and sunday morning, and sunday
afternoon is (currently) dedicated to o
13 matches
Mail list logo
