> "AC" == Alan Coopersmith writes:
AC> Moves -lm from being hardcoded in Makefile.am to being added via
AC> AC_SEARCH_LIBS in configure.ac setting it in $(LIBS)
AC> Using lrint() [returns long int] instead of rint() [returns double]
AC> clears a bunch of gcc warnings of the form:
AC> "cast f
Keith,
Please pull the XI 2.2 work into master. This bumps the input ABI to 15, but
I also hope that we don't need another bump this cycle. Carlos found the
one known outstanding active grab bug that has now been fixed.
This patchset should not affect normal pointer/keyboard behaviour, any such
b
On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:47 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> If the device is already grabbed, don't activate the passive grab, it screws
> with our event masks. Just deliver to the grabbing client instead.
>
> Reported-by: Carlos Garnacho
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
Makes sense to me.
Reviewed-
Moves -lm from being hardcoded in Makefile.am to being added via
AC_SEARCH_LIBS in configure.ac setting it in $(LIBS)
Using lrint() [returns long int] instead of rint() [returns double]
clears a bunch of gcc warnings of the form:
"cast from function call of type ‘double’ to non-matching type ‘shor
If the device is already grabbed, don't activate the passive grab, it screws
with our event masks. Just deliver to the grabbing client instead.
Reported-by: Carlos Garnacho
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
Xi/exevents.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
dispatch.h was leftover from an earlier implementation and is no longer
needed, so remove it since including it causes a build failure due to
conflicts between GL/gl.h and OpenGL/gl.h
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston
---
hw/xquartz/GL/indirect.c |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 de
On Dec 20, 2011, at 3:39 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 03:22 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> It looks like this is causing a build regression on the tinderbox:
>> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2011-12-20-0004/logs/xserver/#build
>>
>> It looks odd, so I'll take a look at it tonight, bu
On 12/19/11 18:50, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Provide end users with a workaround if they find code doesn't build with
the -Werror=... flags provided by BASE_CFLAGS. This can be useful if
newer util-macros are used with older source code that had problems, or
in the rare case when warnings are exp
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 04:32:52PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> From: Peter Hutterer
>
> Does not include pointer emulation handling.
> Does include partial ownership handling but not the actual processing of
> ownership events.
>
> Note: this commit is a retroactive commit extracted from a ser
On 12/20/2011 05:16 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Leftover code from an earlier version of GetTouchEvents.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> ---
> As mentioned in another email. This is just cleanup without a functional
> change. The client_id as first element was a requirement in earlier version
On 12/20/2011 05:14 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 06:33:06PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
>> On Dec 14, 2011, at 7:01 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>>> The DIX needs to submit touch events for e.g. TouchEnd after an
>>> acceptance/rejection. These have the TOUCH_CLIENT_ID flag set
Leftover code from an earlier version of GetTouchEvents.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
As mentioned in another email. This is just cleanup without a functional
change. The client_id as first element was a requirement in earlier versions
and got virtually removed except for the client_id part.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 06:33:06PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2011, at 7:01 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > The DIX needs to submit touch events for e.g. TouchEnd after an
> > acceptance/rejection. These have the TOUCH_CLIENT_ID flag set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> > ---
On 12/20/2011 04:24 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> ---
> Changes to v1:
> - check for mode XIGrabModeTouch on touch grabs
Looks good!
Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X
From: Peter Hutterer
Ownership changes don't get processed directly when they happen, instead the
DIX submits an ownership event which goes through ProcessTouchEvents and
ProcessTouchOwnershipEvents.
Then on the required events are generated and sent to clients.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone
Sig
From: Peter Hutterer
Includes a hack for implicit grab activation, because integrating this
requires a larger rewrite and I'm not sleeping enough as it is.
Right now, we deliver the event and check before/after if there is an
implicit grab on. If one activated, then store the event in the grab an
From: Peter Hutterer
Does not include pointer emulation handling.
Does include partial ownership handling but not the actual processing of
ownership events.
Note: this commit is a retroactive commit extracted from a series of ~50
commits and may thus appear a bit more complicated than what you'd
Co-authored-by: Daniel Stone
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
---
Changes to v1:
- check for mode XIGrabModeTouch on touch grabs
Xi/exevents.c | 28
Xi/xipassivegrab.c | 17 +++--
include/exevents.h |8
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:46:02PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 03:36 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:32:29AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:01:25PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> >>> On Dec 14, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Peter Hutterer
On 12/20/2011 03:36 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:32:29AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:01:25PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
>>> On Dec 14, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Peter Hutterer
>>> wrote:
From: Daniel Stone
Touch events' sprite trac
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:32:29AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:01:25PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Peter Hutterer
> > wrote:
> > > From: Daniel Stone
> > >
> > > Touch events' sprite trace stays the same for the duration of the touc
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:01:25PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > From: Daniel Stone
> >
> > Touch events' sprite trace stays the same for the duration of the touch
> > sequence.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> > ---
> > dix/touch.c
It looks like this is causing a build regression on the tinderbox:
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2011-12-20-0004/logs/xserver/#build
It looks odd, so I'll take a look at it tonight, but I wanted to bring it up.
--Jeremy
On Dec 19, 2011, at 10:52 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> glx/Makefile.am
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:53:41AM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 07:01 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >
> > This is the set of patches to add multitouch support to the X server.
> > The lot can be found in the 'multitouch' branches of the following
> > repositories
> >
> > git://pe
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:04:38AM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 12/19/2011 07:27 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:20:38PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
> >> On Dec 14, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Peter Hutterer
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>> +static void
> >>> +TouchAddAc
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:46:27AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 12/8/11 10:36 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> >@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ GetEventFilterMask(DeviceIntPtr dev, int evtype)
> > return filters[dev ? dev->id : 0][evtype];
> > }
> >
> >-static inline Mask
> >+inline Mask
> > GetXI2Even
7af23259d88f4c28ed21140f82cc03b3724c06bb introduced a regression, fixed in
the first of the two patches. The second one is a rather long-standing bug
that probably affects all XI2-capable servers and should land on 1.11.
commit fcda98c48610fd507ca0b89c6006a5497d9dc1c9
The following changes since
On 12/19/2011 02:23 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Realistically, we can't remove these from the protocol without breaking
> older libraries.
>
> Introduced in a02566ca7fd37d279b957037e1251a3b3419866d
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> ---
> XI.h | 11 +++
> 1 files changed, 11 insertio
On 12/19/2011 02:22 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Copy/paste error from DeviceChangedEvent
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> ---
> XI2proto.h |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/XI2proto.h b/XI2proto.h
> index 56df401..93d7e32 100644
> --- a/XI2proto.h
On 12/15/2011 06:43 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> If the device is mapped 3 2 1, a click on physical button 1 sends a button 3
> press, but the state was set for button 1. Fix this, the state must be set
> for that button's logical mapping.
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655928
>
>
On 12/18/2011 09:00 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> An empty list points to itself but syncEvents has the list head only and is
> of a different format than the elements. Thus, casting it to a QdEventPtr
> gives us garbage.
>
> Segfaults with XTS test case Xlib13/XGrabKeyboard
>
> Introduced in 7af23
From: Tormod Volden
Do not check edid pointer since it was already done.
Remove commented return statement.
Also separate declaration from code, which fixes remaining
gcc -pedantic warnings.
Signed-off-by: Tormod Volden
---
edid-decode.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 d
From: Tormod Volden
For instance, the handling of week=0xff or week=0 was not working,
as could be seen from the data/sharp-* examples.
Only EDID version 1.4 requires the year to be 2006 or later.
Actually, data/sharp-aquos-hdmi reports 1.3 but seems to use month
0xff to flag model year, which
From: Tormod Volden
So that the version conformance flags can be used in other code.
Signed-off-by: Tormod Volden
---
edid-decode.c | 38 +++---
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/edid-decode.c b/edid-decode.c
index ab4bde8..c3e55
Uses /proc/pid/psinfo to read command & partial arguments.
Moves cmdsize & argsize variables into non-Solaris #else clause
to avoid unused variable warnings.
Fixes format mismatch errors when building with DEBUG defined on
a 64-bit platform (where Mask is defined as CARD32).
Signed-off-by: Alan
> On 12/20/11 12:26, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > What would you prefer?
>
> I'd prefer not supporting broken hacks pretending to be new ABI models.
>
> Is there any real benefit to "AMD64-x32" over simply x86-32
Whole AMD64 ISA is accessible: twice as much registers (including xmm/ymm),
instru
> > On 12/20/11 08:37, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > > + (defined(__amd64__)&& defined(__LP64__)) /* skip x32 */ || \
> > > + defined(amd64) || \
> >
> > Really? Someone defined __amd64__ on a non LP64 platform and didn't expect
> > to break tons of software? Amazing...
>
> A bit will
On 12/20/11 13:09, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
On 12/20/11 12:26, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
What would you prefer?
I'd prefer not supporting broken hacks pretending to be new ABI models.
Is there any real benefit to "AMD64-x32" over simply x86-32
Whole AMD64 ISA is accessible: twice as much r
On 12/20/2011 12:31 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
This giant series of patches implements GLX_ARB_create_context,
GLX_ARB_create_context_profile, and GLX_EXT_create_context_es2_profile.
One of the difficulties with this patch series is that I had to rework
some of the Gallium context creation plumbing
On 12/20/11 12:26, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
What would you prefer?
I'd prefer not supporting broken hacks pretending to be new ABI models.
Is there any real benefit to "AMD64-x32" over simply x86-32 or AMD64 for X
applications?
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
From: Ian Romanick
Using 'new' as a function parameter name prevents including
glxclient.h the unit tests (future patch) that use the Google C++
Testing Framework.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/glxclient.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/
From: Ian Romanick
This extension is only enabled if the underlying driver advertises
support for OpenGL ES 2.0. This happens either through the getAPIMask
function in version 2 of the DRI2 extension or implicity through
version 2 of the DRISW extension.
Since there is no OpenGL ES 2.0 protocol
From: Ian Romanick
This adds support for DRI_DRI2 version 3 to all of the DRI2 drivers.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
.../state_trackers/dri/common/dri_context.c| 51 -
.../state_trackers/dri/common/dri_context.h|4 +
src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/dri_util.c
From: Ian Romanick
This also enables GLX_ARB_create_context and
GLX_ARB_create_context_profile if the driver supports DRI_DRISW
version 3 or greater.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/drisw_glx.c | 89 ++-
1 files changed, 88 insertions(+
From: Ian Romanick
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
include/GL/internal/dri_interface.h | 20 +++-
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/GL/internal/dri_interface.h
b/include/GL/internal/dri_interface.h
index add03c7..b21445f 100644
--- a/incl
From: Ian Romanick
This converts all of the GLX data from glXCreateContextAttribsARB to
the values expected by the DRI driver interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/dri_common.c | 102 ++
src/glx/dri_common.h |6 +++
2 files cha
From: Ian Romanick
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/mesa/state_tracker/st_manager.c |8 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_manager.c
b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_manager.c
index 828f0d8..1cee312 100644
--- a/src/mesa/state_tr
From: Ian Romanick
This adds the function and modifies dri2CreateNewContextForAPI to call
it. At this point only version 2 of the DRI2 API is advertised to the
loader.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/common/dri_util.c | 97 +++
1 files change
From: Ian Romanick
Note that these extensions are not automatically enabled for screens
capable of direct-rendering.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/glxextensions.c |2 ++
src/glx/glxextensions.h |4 +++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/glx/gl
From: Ian Romanick
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/glxcmds.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/glx/glxcmds.c b/src/glx/glxcmds.c
index f7cbf2f..37c0933 100644
--- a/src/glx/glxcmds.c
+++ b/src/glx/glxcmds.c
@@ -2603,6 +2603,9 @@ static const
From: Ian Romanick
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/Makefile |1 +
src/glx/create_context.c | 117 ++
src/glx/glxclient.h |2 +
src/glx/glxcmds.c|2 +-
4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create
From: Ian Romanick
This also enables GLX_ARB_create_context and
GLX_ARB_create_context_profile if the driver supports DRI_DRI2 version
3 or greater.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/dri2_glx.c | 92 +++-
1 files changed, 91 insertions(+)
From: Ian Romanick
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/indirect_glx.c | 24 +++-
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/glx/indirect_glx.c b/src/glx/indirect_glx.c
index b628688..2399375 100644
--- a/src/glx/indirect_glx.c
+++ b/src/glx/ind
From: Ian Romanick
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/dri2_glx.c |3 ++-
src/glx/dri_glx.c |3 ++-
src/glx/glxclient.h|8
src/glx/indirect_glx.c |3 ++-
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/glx/dri2_glx.c b/src/glx/dri2_g
From: Ian Romanick
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
include/GL/internal/dri_interface.h | 52 +-
1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/GL/internal/dri_interface.h
b/include/GL/internal/dri_interface.h
index 4f768f0..add03c7 100
From: Ian Romanick
__glX_send_client_info only supports XCB, so use that instead of
__glXClientInfo when USE_XCB is defined.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/glxext.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/glx/glxext.c b/src/glx/glxext.c
index ba
From: Ian Romanick
This function picks the correct client-info protocol (based on the
server's GLX version and set of extensions) and sends it to the
server.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/glx/Makefile |1 +
src/glx/clientinfo.c | 156 +
From: Ian Romanick
This won't be used in the client-side libGL, but the xserver has to
generate a different protocol error depending on the reason context
creation failed.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick
---
src/gallium/include/state_tracker/st_api.h | 14 ++
.../state_tracke
From: Ian Romanick
There seems to have been two different ways to communicate the
profile. There were flags and there were profiles. I've opted to
remove the profile flags and use ST_PROFILE_DEFAULT (compatibility
profile) and ST_PROFILE_OPENGL_CORE (core profile) consistently
instead.
Also ch
This giant series of patches implements GLX_ARB_create_context,
GLX_ARB_create_context_profile, and GLX_EXT_create_context_es2_profile.
One of the difficulties with this patch series is that I had to rework
some of the Gallium context creation plumbing. In order for the xserver
to generate the co
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:02:18 +0100 (CET)
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:41:44 -0800
> > From: Alan Coopersmith
> >
> > Are you sure that every real amd64 platform that uses __amd64__
> > defines __LP64__ as well?
>
> Not sure if you'd call 64-bit Windows a real amd64 platfo
On 12/14/2011 07:01 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> This is the set of patches to add multitouch support to the X server.
> The lot can be found in the 'multitouch' branches of the following
> repositories
>
> git://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/xserver
> git://people.freedesktop.org/~whot/i
On 12/14/2011 07:02 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> diff --git a/Xi/xipassivegrab.c b/Xi/xipassivegrab.c
> index 713a165..fa2db38 100644
> --- a/Xi/xipassivegrab.c
> +++ b/Xi/xipassivegrab.c
> @@ -108,19 +108,29 @@ ProcXIPassiveGrabDevice(ClientPtr client)
> if (stuff->grab_type != XIGrabtypeButto
Sent from my iPhone...
On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:58, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 18:50 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>
>> Provide end users with a workaround if they find code doesn't build with
>> the -Werror=... flags provided by BASE_CFLAGS. This can be useful if
>> newer u
On 12/14/2011 07:02 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Ownership changes don't get processed directly when they happen, instead the
> DIX submits an ownership event which goes through ProcessTouchEvents and
> ProcessTouchOwnershipEvents.
> Then on the required events are generated and sent to clients.
>
On 12/14/2011 07:02 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Includes a hack for implicit grab activation, because integrating this
> requires a larger rewrite and I'm not sleeping enough as it is.
> Right now, we deliver the event and check before/after if there is an
> implicit grab on. If one activated, then
On 12/20/11 09:02, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:41:44 -0800
From: Alan Coopersmith
Are you sure that every real amd64 platform that uses __amd64__
defines __LP64__ as well?
Not sure if you'd call 64-bit Windows a real amd64 platform, but given
that Microsoft made the brillian
On 12/14/2011 07:02 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Does not include pointer emulation handling.
> Does include partial ownership handling but not the actual processing of
> ownership events.
>
> Note: this commit is a retroactive commit extracted from a series of ~50
> commits and may thus appear a b
On 12/18/2011 04:04 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Adds support for the new TouchClass for multitouch-capable servers/devices.
>
> New events:
> XITouchOwnershipEvent
>
> New event types handled:
> XITouchBegin, XITouchUpdate, XITouchEnd
> XIRawTouchBegin, XIRawTouchUpdate, XIRawTouchEnd
>
>
On 12/8/11 10:36 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ GetEventFilterMask(DeviceIntPtr dev, int evtype)
return filters[dev ? dev->id : 0][evtype];
}
-static inline Mask
+inline Mask
GetXI2EventFilterMask(int evtype)
{
return (1<< (evtype % 8));
This reads strangely
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:41:44 -0800
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 12/20/11 08:37, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > + (defined(__amd64__)&& defined(__LP64__)) /* skip x32 */ || \
> > + defined(amd64) || \
>
> Really? Someone defined __amd64__ on a non LP64 platform and didn't expect
> to bre
Follow changes from xproto/Xmd.h
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich
---
include/X11/Xtos.h |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/X11/Xtos.h b/include/X11/Xtos.h
index 7079321..9572237 100644
--- a/include/X11/Xtos.h
+++ b/include/X11/Xtos.h
@@ -62,7 +6
Fixes build failure of libXmu:
libXmu-1.1.0/work/libXmu-1.1.0/src/EditresCom.c: In function
'_XEditresGetStringValues':
libXmu-1.1.0/work/libXmu-1.1.0/src/EditresCom.c:2198:6: error: duplicate case
value
libXmu-1.1.0/work/libXmu-1.1.0/src/EditresCom.c:2194:6: error: previously used
here
Signed-
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:41:44 -0800
> From: Alan Coopersmith
>
> Are you sure that every real amd64 platform that uses __amd64__
> defines __LP64__ as well?
Not sure if you'd call 64-bit Windows a real amd64 platform, but given
that Microsoft made the brilliant decision to use the LLP64 mode
On 12/19/2011 07:27 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 07:20:38PM -0800, Chase Douglas wrote:
>> On Dec 14, 2011, at 7:02 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> +static void
>>> +TouchAddActiveGrabListener(DeviceIntPtr dev, TouchPointInfoPtr ti,
>>> +
On 12/20/11 11:41 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 12/20/11 08:37, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
+ (defined(__amd64__)&& defined(__LP64__)) /* skip x32 */ || \
+ defined(amd64) || \
Really? Someone defined __amd64__ on a non LP64 platform and didn't expect
to break tons of software? Amazing...
Yea
On 12/17/11 8:03 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
I think this needs to be accompanied by a change to DamageRegister (or
miDamageRegister) to bump the drawable's serial number, or else creating
a Damage object on a drawable won't cause GCs that are already validated
against it to have the damage ops ho
On 12/20/11 08:37, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
+ (defined(__amd64__)&& defined(__LP64__)) /* skip x32 */ || \
+ defined(amd64) || \
Really? Someone defined __amd64__ on a non LP64 platform and didn't expect
to break tons of software? Amazing...
I'd expect damage from such idiocy to g
On 12/20/2011 07:21 AM, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.12.2011 04:22, schrieb Peter Hutterer:
>> If touch client has not registered for ownership events and a grab above
>> that client is rejected, the client needs to receive the complete event
>> history.
>>
>> The history currently doesn't rea
On 12/20/11 01:19, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On 12/01/11 20:59, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 12/01/11 04:04, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Re-sending, sorry missed the [PATCH] off the subject line...
Fix some resource& memory leaks in libxtrans.
Signed-off-by: Alan Hourihane
The free()s look just like
Am 20.12.2011 04:22, schrieb Peter Hutterer:
> If touch client has not registered for ownership events and a grab above
> that client is rejected, the client needs to receive the complete event
> history.
>
> The history currently doesn't really do fancy overflow handling. We assume
> that the f
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 18:50 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> Provide end users with a workaround if they find code doesn't build with
> the -Werror=... flags provided by BASE_CFLAGS. This can be useful if
> newer util-macros are used with older source code that had problems, or
> in the rare cas
On 12/01/11 20:59, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 12/01/11 04:04, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>> Re-sending, sorry missed the [PATCH] off the subject line...
>>
>> Fix some resource& memory leaks in libxtrans.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Hourihane
>
> The free()s look just like a patch I wrote yesterday to
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:29:52 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston
wrote:
> Jeremy Huddleston (3):
> XQuartz: Provide in-tree implementation of strndup(3) if needed
> configure.ac: Make Xephyr dependency error message more informative
> kdrive/linux: Fix compilation with -Werror=int-to-pointer
84 matches
Mail list logo
