[PATCH] xf86: call enter/leave VT for gpu screens as well

2012-09-02 Thread Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie Otherwise we can't do fast user switch properly for multiple GPUs. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c index 47429ec..3

pull req (review req in disguise)

2012-09-02 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Keith, This is hotplug and udev stuff. You reviewed one of the hotplug ones, the other fixes providers on recycle, needs more work in the future but it good for now. The 3 udev patches have been tested to make sure that seat supports works with output hotplug devices and we are shipping them

Re: [PULL] list.h compliance changes (fixes to work with clang -O)

2012-09-02 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 09/ 2/12 01:35 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > I think we're still waiting for confirmation from Alan than the AC_C_TYPEOF > works properly with SunCC, but assuming he gives his ack, I'd like to get > these in before we tag 1.13, so the lists will behave correctly (and pass > make chec

Re: [PATCH] Correct description of -displayfd option in man page.

2012-09-02 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 09/ 2/12 03:08 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote: > A display number is written to the specified fd, not a port number. > > Signed-off-by: Jon TURNEY > --- > man/Xserver.man |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/man/Xserver.man b/man/Xserver.man > index 8d243d6..b

[PATCH] Correct description of -displayfd option in man page.

2012-09-02 Thread Jon TURNEY
A display number is written to the specified fd, not a port number. Signed-off-by: Jon TURNEY --- man/Xserver.man |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/Xserver.man b/man/Xserver.man index 8d243d6..b103551 100644 --- a/man/Xserver.man +++ b/man/Xserver.man

[PULL] list.h compliance changes (fixes to work with clang -O)

2012-09-02 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
I think we're still waiting for confirmation from Alan than the AC_C_TYPEOF works properly with SunCC, but assuming he gives his ack, I'd like to get these in before we tag 1.13, so the lists will behave correctly (and pass make check) when built with clang -O. --Jeremy --- The following chan

Re: [PATCH:xscope 04/24] Convert some for loops to use C99-style inline variable declarations

2012-09-02 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 10:21:14AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > On 09/ 1/12 03:33 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> From: Alan Coopersmith > >> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:17:46 -0700 > > > > Please don't do this. Some OpenBSD platforms are still stuck with GCC > > 2.95.3. GCC 2.95.3 is almost a

Re: [PATCH:xscope 04/24] Convert some for loops to use C99-style inline variable declarations

2012-09-02 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 1 September 2012 10:21, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > I do wonder though about the viability of updating some parts of your system > to 2012 releases while keeping others stuck at a 2001 release. I certainly > don't try to build current X.Org releases on Solaris 8 with our Studio 8 > compile