Re: [RFC] X.Org minimum requirements for Autotools policy review

2013-10-25 Thread Gaetan Nadon
On 13-10-25 01:49 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:17:48PM -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote: >> The current Autotools minimum requirements are stated in >> http://www.x.org/wiki/ModularDevelopersGuide. >> >> * autoconf (2.60) >> * automake (1.10) >> * libtool (1.5)

[PULL] Enable GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float for DRI2 drivers

2013-10-25 Thread Ian Romanick
Add all of the infrastructure necessary for GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float in DRI2 drivers. The extension will always be advertised, but drivers are not required to provide any float configs. The following changes since commit 7ecfab47eb221dbb996ea6c033348b8eceaeb893: glx: Add support for the new DRI

Re: [PATCH RESEND] xfree86: Find primary entity when bus types are nominally different

2013-10-25 Thread Tormod Volden
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Connor Behan wrote: > As of server 1.13, systems with DRM and Udev will have BUS_PLATFORM as > their primary bus type. However, drivers not implementing a > platformProbe function will still create entities of type BUS_PCI. We > need to account for this when checkin

Re: [RFC] X.Org minimum requirements for Autotools policy review

2013-10-25 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > Speaking of Mesa, you may be concerned that part of Mesa source code is > GPL v3. I suppose it taints xorg which links to mesa. That was another > question I had. The only thing I see in Mesa is ralloc.h, which lists LGPLv3, but I think it's

Re: [RFC] X.Org minimum requirements for Autotools policy review

2013-10-25 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Gaetan Nadon wrote: >> Speaking of Mesa, you may be concerned that part of Mesa source code is >> GPL v3. I suppose it taints xorg which links to mesa. That was another >> question I had. > > The only thing I

Re: [RFC] X.Org minimum requirements for Autotools policy review

2013-10-25 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > Ah, missing some context: > > /* > * The talloc implementation is available under the GNU Lesser > * General Public License (GNU LGPL), version 3 or later. It is > * more sophisticated than ralloc in that it includes reference > * counting

[PATCH r128] Do not use int10 or VBE on powerpc

2013-10-25 Thread Tormod Volden
From: Tormod Volden VBE was already skipped in the normal path, but not when setting the PROBE_DETECT flag. Should avoid bus error seen in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622606 and http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2012-February/053969.html Signed-off-by: Tormod Volden --- s

Re: [RFC] X.Org minimum requirements for Autotools policy review

2013-10-25 Thread Gaetan Nadon
On 13-10-25 01:56 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Matt Turner wrote: >> Ah, missing some context: >> >> /* >> * The talloc implementation is available under the GNU Lesser >> * General Public License (GNU LGPL), version 3 or later. It is >> * more sophisticated than r

Re: [PATCH r128] Do not use int10 or VBE on powerpc

2013-10-25 Thread Connor Behan
On 25/10/13 12:00 PM, lists.tor...@gmail.com wrote: > VBE was already skipped in the normal path, but not when setting > the PROBE_DETECT flag. > > Should avoid bus error seen in > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622606 and > http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2012-February/053969.ht