Hi,
On 03-01-15 23:29, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
In Xlib versions prior to 1.6, if XGetWindowProperty returns a failure,
it didn't always set the property pointer to NULL, and could leave it
uninitialized.
Reported by Oracle Parfait 1.5.1:
Error: Uninitialised memory (CWE 456)
Possible access
Hi,
On 03-01-15 23:30, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Since Xlib prior to 1.6 didn't always clear values on failure, don't
assume they're safe to use unless we succeeded.
Reported by Oracle Parfait 1.5.1:
Error: Uninitialised memory (CWE 456)
Possible access to uninitialised memory '&after'
Hi,
On 04-01-15 00:00, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Since Xlib prior to 1.6 didn't always clear values on failure, don't
assume they're safe to use unless we succeeded.
Reported by Oracle Parfait 1.5.1:
Error: Uninitialised memory
Uninitialised memory variable (CWE 457): Possible access to unini
In Xnest or Xephyr, pressing CapsLock when focus is on another
window does not update the state in the nested X server.
This is because when synchronizing the lock modifier, sending a
keypress or a key release only is not sufficient to toggle the state,
unlike regular modifiers, one has to emulate
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> I noticed the problem fixed by the first patch while debugging a problem with
> the Intel driver in a system using Prime. See that patch for a description of
> what is going wrong there. Unfortunately, Prime configurations are relying on
Keith Packard writes:
> Kenneth Graunke writes:
>
>> That's true. I should probably just resurrect your Xephyr VAO patch, and
>> extend it for the rest of Glamor as well.
>
> Yeah, would be good as that's required for 3.0 core context
> support. Note that most of the VAO work is actually in the
Keith Packard writes:
> Ok, it's (almost) the first working day of the year, and we're supposed
> to be shipping 1.17. I think we're quite close, but I want to make sure
> everyone is ready for the release before it happens.
>
> From my list of pending patches, we've got:
>
> glamor:
> so
Peter Hutterer writes:
> Reported-by: Adam Greenblatt
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
Seems pretty obvious.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.o
On 01/ 4/15 05:35 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Ok, it's (almost) the first working day of the year, and we're supposed
to be shipping 1.17. I think we're quite close, but I want to make sure
everyone is ready for the release before it happens.
From my list of pending patches, we've got:
glamor:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 12:54:28PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Peter Hutterer writes:
>
> > Reported-by: Adam Greenblatt
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
>
> Seems pretty obvious.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt
Thanks!
Keith, can you merge this one directly please? Thanks.
Cheers,
Peter
The CVE fix in:
commit 97015a07b9e15d8ec5608b95d95ec0eb51202acb
Author: Alan Coopersmith
Date: Wed Jan 22 22:37:15 2014 -0800
dix: integer overflow in RegionSizeof() [CVE-2014-8092 3/4]
offended the C++ demons:
../../include/regionstr.h:147:45: error: invalid conversion f
Same code as http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/39718/ but different
comments. My r-b from
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2015-January/045096.html
applies to either set of comments.
-alan-
On 01/ 5/15 01:48 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
The CVE fix in:
commit 97015a07b9e15
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:54 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Same code as http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/39718/ but different
> comments. My r-b from
> http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2015-January/045096.html
> applies to either set of comments.
Tsk, that's what I get for not catch
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 05:35:31PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> Ok, it's (almost) the first working day of the year, and we're supposed
> to be shipping 1.17. I think we're quite close, but I want to make sure
> everyone is ready for the release before it happens.
>
> From my list of pending p
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 10:11:46PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Peter Hutterer writes:
>
> > not 100% sure but should this use $(SHELL)?
>
> Yes.
>
> > also, you probably need to add this to EXTRA_DIST
>
> And, I should add a '.sh' extension, to be consistent.
>
> > other than that a very ha
Peter Hutterer writes:
>> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer
Merged.
1c01633..23a11fd master -> master
--
-keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http:
Peter Hutterer writes:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 12:54:28PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Peter Hutterer writes:
>>
>> > Reported-by: Adam Greenblatt
>> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
>>
>> Seems pretty obvious.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt
>
> Thanks!
>
> Keith, can you merge this one d
Alan Coopersmith writes:
> Is the change discussed on IRC to change the default from --disable-glamor
> to enabling if PKG_CHECK_MODULES(epoxy) slated for 1.18 as well, since it's
> a bit late to change for 1.17?
Yes, I think changing the default build can wait; anyone who wants to
include it in
On 01/ 5/15 08:11 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 07:07:08PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Check for the sysconf value used here, not the one used in the
previous function.
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith
Thanks for the patches, all merged. Aside: Do you really run all the
The kernel might want this information during modesetting.
---
hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c
b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c
index 824500b..27b7fd8 100644
-
On 01/04/2015 05:35 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Ok, it's (almost) the first working day of the year, and we're supposed
to be shipping 1.17. I think we're quite close, but I want to make sure
everyone is ready for the release before it happens.
From my list of pending patches, we've got:
glamor:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:44:22PM +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> In Xnest or Xephyr, pressing CapsLock when focus is on another
> window does not update the state in the nested X server.
>
> This is because when synchronizing the lock modifier, sending a
> keypress or a key release only is not s
Aaron Plattner writes:
> I mentioned it on IRC but I should probably say it here too for the
> record: I don't think this should go into 1.17. It's a big enough
> change in behavior that some soak time on master is probably warranted.
> We can always backport it to server-1.17-branch later
Regression introduced in libXxf86vm 1.1.3 / commit 284a88e21fc05a63466
Unlikely to be hit in practice since it requires out-of-range privsize
or malloc failure while talking to a server using the XFree86 3.x version
of the protocol.
Found by Oracle Parfait 1.5.1:
Error: Uninitialised memory (CWE
Ignore this - this version isn't quite right either, since it doesn't switch
between the two reply sizes.
-alan-
On 01/ 5/15 11:42 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Regression introduced in libXxf86vm 1.1.3 / commit 284a88e21fc05a63466
Unlikely to be hit in practice since it requires out-of-r
25 matches
Mail list logo
