On 21/02/17 03:55 AM, Xiaogang Chen wrote:
> xf86DDCGetModes generates some DisplayMods that are not used and not released
> after.
> Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99521
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaogang Chen
> ---
> hw/xfree86/modes/xf86EdidModes.c | 17 +
> 1 f
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:55:49PM -0600, Xiaogang Chen wrote:
> xf86DDCGetModes generates some DisplayMods that are not used and not released
> after.
> Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99521
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaogang Chen
> ---
> hw/xfree86/modes/xf86EdidModes.c | 17
Of sorts, actually make it confine to the pointer focus, as the
InputOnly window is entirely invisible to xwayland accounting,
we don't have a xwl_window for it.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Garnacho
---
v2: Check that ConfineTo and focus windows clients are the same.
hw/xwayland/xwayland.c | 5 +
Of sorts, as we can't honor pointer warping across the whole root window
coordinates, peek the pointer focus in this case.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Garnacho
---
v2: Check that requester and focus window clients are the same
hw/xwayland/xwayland.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff -
xf86DDCGetModes generates some DisplayMods that are not used and not released
after.
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99521
Signed-off-by: Xiaogang Chen
---
hw/xfree86/modes/xf86EdidModes.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
hw/vfb/InitOutput.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/vfb/InitOutput.c b/hw/vfb/InitOutput.c
index d7bfd70..6d386ee 100644
--- a/hw/vfb/InitOutput.c
+++ b/hw/vfb/InitOutput.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ from The Open Group.
#define VFB
Hi everyone,
I've got a Qt5 client, which receives mouse input only and freezes
soon and often. It gets stuck waiting for a reply from the server.
Pressing a none-modifier key releases the lock and the client
continues as normal until the next freeze.
I've traced the bug down to a regression impl
- Original Message -
> I'd like to do another 1.19 soonish, say middle of next week.
That would be great if we could get to the bottom of the random crashes that
affect 1.19.x first.
Good news is we now have a core file from downstream bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1
On 17/02/17 05:25 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I'd like to do another 1.19 soonish, say middle of next week. If you've
> got favorite patches you'd like to see included, please write their
> sha1s on the back of a $50 bill and send them to me.
:)
> Alternatively, reply to this email, or send a pull
