On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 03:14:00PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Found by Oracle's Parfait 2.2 static analyzer:
>
> Error: File Leak
>File Leak [file-ptr-leak]:
> Leaked File fp
> at line 94 of lib/libXpm/src/RdFToBuf.c in function
> 'XpmReadFileToBuffer
> '.
> fp i
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:11:07AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Does anyone have feedback on changing our README's like this? While I
> sent this out as a patch to a specific repo, I figured once we have
> an agreed upon template, we'd apply it to all of the repos.
oh well, if you ask... :)
On 2018-10-01 12:19 p.m., Dem Bat wrote:
> (==)Using system config directory "/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d"
> (EE)
> (EE) Backtrace:
> (EE) 0: /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x4d) [0x560589b14e3d]
> (EE) 1: /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg (0x56058995d000+bbbd9) [0x560589b18bd9]
> (EE) 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
Does anyone have feedback on changing our README's like this? While I
sent this out as a patch to a specific repo, I figured once we have
an agreed upon template, we'd apply it to all of the repos.
-alan-
On 09/22/18 12:11 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith
-
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 11:31 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> AFAICT the free(dst) is always wrong. The other places we use
> drmmode_prop_info_copy, we're initializing an array in the middle of a
> drmmode_{crtc,output}_private_rec.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/merge_requests/33
- aja
Hi all,
Once more huge thanks to the entire team from g.p.u.l. and Igalia,
personally I think this was an extremely well organized XDC!
As usual we're looking for feedback on both XDC itself, and the CFP
process and program selection. Both about what was great and should be
kept for next year's e
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 11:01 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 at 11:21, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >
> > +static Bool
> > +drmmode_prop_info_copy(drmmode_prop_info_ptr dst,
> > + const drmmode_prop_info_rec *src,
> > + unsigned int num_props,
> >