Re: Licenses: being finicky

On 14.02.24 21:37, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote: Hi, Some meson.build, for example, have a SPDX-License-Identifier: tag, you're raising a good point. I've already been thinking about replacing the repeated long lincense text all over the source files by tiny SPDX-License-Identifier (possibly eve

gitlab: failing check-merge-request on non MR branches

Hello friends, is it intended that the check-merge-request job is always failing on non MR branches ? Fortunately it's just classified as warning instead of fail, but still troubling: either one has to check the indivual job results or risks not noticing other warnings that indeed are also rele

Re: Licenses: being finicky

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:04:42PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 14.02.24 21:37, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote: >[...] > > I think that the correct way is to state 'X11' or 'MIT' or > > whatever matches COPYING or COPYRIGHTS or whatever file explains the > > license status and t

Re: gitlab: failing check-merge-request on non MR branches

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > Hello friends, > > > is it intended that the check-merge-request job is always failing on > non MR branches ? > When requesting a merge, I had errors with the CI. But this had to do with the git commit messages

Stepping in as Xnest maintainer

Hello folks, since Xnest seems to be unmaintained for quite some time now, I've decided to step in as it's maintainer. Here's a PR for that - including some Xnest fixes. https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1299 --mtx -- --- Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können l

Re: Stepping in as Xnest maintainer

Hi, Whilst I'm sure this is a nice thing to do -- is there any reason why you're wanting to invest your time in maintaining Xnest, when Xephyr seems to have a lot of additional features already? Kindly, Thomas On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 15:30, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > > Hello folks

Re: gitlab: failing check-merge-request on non MR branches

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > Hello friends, > > > is it intended that the check-merge-request job is always failing on > non MR branches ? See commit 88637d42dbc5c488c9a75a6042e6778c4928b007 in ci-templates for the motivation. I think that