Hey,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 2:49 AM Alan Coopersmith <
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote:
> […]
> Do we want to keep insisting on this as part of our style, or have people
> gotten used to it from other languages/projects now and are willing to
> accept it in X.Org code?
>
I reckon having the
On 31/Jul/2024 00:31, Jeremy Sequoia wrote:
<...>
> I'd even go farther and say that we should allow code that requires C11.
C11 might be slightly problematic in some platforms, but C99 is
currently widely available and has 99% of the interesting stuff...
I feel very strongly that we should be able to leverage language features that
have existed for longer than college graduates have been alive and should
remove warnings designed to ensure we maintain compatibility with compilers
that existed when pinball machines were all the rage.
I'd even go
