> but simply being more enthusiastic about accepting contributions doesn't
> seem like a great plan (compare the code quality of nouveau, intel and
> radeon to that of some of the out of tree drivers, for instance)
I think that is a little naïve. There is a difference between vendors
attempting
> > See, this was exactly the problem here. It _was_ a freedesktop admin.
> > And it was pretty clear that it was that from the onset too. Mailing
> > fd.o admins, even if i could've dug up an email address in the split
> > second that i wrote the email (heck, i even mistyped repository), was
> > n
> What would you suggest should be done next? Checking logs for traces
> of this? Those which could reveal this information might be gone already.
Looking for anything which is in the tree but not in or not matching the
mail archive. Sounds like a job for a perl nutter 8)
And chasing down who did
> It's on a separate branch, not master. (Doesn't mean it's right, just
> that it's not actually going to cripple anything or waste time for anyone
> who doesn't ask for it.)
And how many other un-noticed commits did this person make ? Until you
know that you have to assume a complete compromise
