Em 28-06-2011 11:11, Cyril Brulebois escreveu:
Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
---
configure.ac |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
The version number wasn't bumped after 0.2.0; given the big changes from
Mauro Carvalho Chehab to support V4L2, having
Em 14-05-2011 01:07, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
On 14.05.2011 01:39, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 13-05-2011 01:48, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
On 12.05.2011 04:36, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 12-05-2011 03:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
Em 12-05-2011 02:37, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
I
Em 12-05-2011 08:05, Peter Hutterer escreveu:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:36:47AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 12-05-2011 03:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
Em 12-05-2011 02:37, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
I don't see any other places:
$ git grep 'REP_PERIOD' .
dvb/dvb-usb/dvb-usb
Em 13-05-2011 01:48, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
On 12.05.2011 04:36, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 12-05-2011 03:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
Em 12-05-2011 02:37, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
I don't see any other places:
$ git grep 'REP_PERIOD' .
dvb/dvb-usb/dvb-usb-remote.c: input_dev
Em 11-05-2011 18:33, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
On 11.05.2011 07:46, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Anssi/Peter,
Hi!
Em 10-05-2011 15:43, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
On 10.05.2011 08:30, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:14:30AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
On 10.05.2011 07:11
Em 11-05-2011 19:59, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
No. It actually depends on what driver you're using. For example, for most
dvb-usb
devices, this is given by the logic bellow:
if (d-props.rc.legacy.rc_interval 40)
d-props.rc.legacy.rc_interval = 100; /* default */
Em 12-05-2011 02:17, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
On 11.05.2011 23:53, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:59:16PM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
I meant replacing the softrepeat with native repeat for such devices
that have native repeats but no native release events:
- keypress from
Em 12-05-2011 02:37, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
On 12.05.2011 02:52, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 11-05-2011 19:59, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
No. It actually depends on what driver you're using. For example, for most
dvb-usb
devices, this is given by the logic bellow:
if (d
Em 12-05-2011 03:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
Em 12-05-2011 02:37, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
I don't see any other places:
$ git grep 'REP_PERIOD' .
dvb/dvb-usb/dvb-usb-remote.c: input_dev-rep[REP_PERIOD] =
d-props.rc.legacy.rc_interval;
Indeed, the REP_PERIOD is not adjusted
Hi Anssi/Peter,
Em 10-05-2011 15:43, Anssi Hannula escreveu:
On 10.05.2011 08:30, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:14:30AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
On 10.05.2011 07:11, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 07:38:00AM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
Hi all!
Most
);
return (char *) (*privates) + key-offset;
}
As nobody registered it, key-initialized is FALSE, and assert will
complain, causing the crash.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86xv.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86xv.c
index 016db1f..70b2207 100644
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86xv.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86xv.c
index 016db1f..858d3bc 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86xv.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86xv.c
@@ -218,7 +218,14 @@ xf86XVQueryOffscreenImages(
ScreenPtr pScreen,
int
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
diff --git a/src/v4l.c b/src/v4l.c
index 605454b..a51f00f 100644
--- a/src/v4l.c
+++ b/src/v4l.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include regionstr.h
#include dgaproc.h
#include xf86str.h
+#include fourcc.h
#include asm/ioctl.h /* _IORW(xxx
bugs and clean the
code.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
diff --git a/src/v4l.c b/src/v4l.c
index a51f00f..8b3d87e 100644
--- a/src/v4l.c
+++ b/src/v4l.c
@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ v4lSetup(pointer module, pointer opts, int *errmaj, int
*errmin)
typedef struct _XvV4LCtrlRec
Fix a small non-compliance issue: if a port attribute is not known,
according with Xv specs, it should return BadMatch, and not BadValue.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
diff --git a/src/v4l.c b/src/v4l.c
index 8b3d87e..fbb8bd7 100644
--- a/src/v4l.c
+++ b/src/v4l.c
video format.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
diff --git a/src/v4l.c b/src/v4l.c
index fbb8bd7..877977c 100644
--- a/src/v4l.c
+++ b/src/v4l.c
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ static struct V4L_DEVICE {
static int SetV4LFmt(int fd, CARD32 pixelformat)
{
struct v4l2_framebuffer fbuf
The device name and the file descriptors are wrong at the cal for
v4l_check_yuv(). Due to that, the driver were falling back to work
with RGB formats.
While here, add a code to prevent V4L driver to work if no video
adapter provide Xv overlay method.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche
probably need to check for
driver versions after reenabling the correct (not working) code,
or to use the new VIDIOC ioctl's to enumberate the supported
formats.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com
diff --git a/src/v4l.c b/src/v4l.c
index 7b3d538..10e782b 100644
--- a/src/v4l.c
Carvalho Chehab (8):
Port xf86-video-v4l driver to V4L2
Coding style Cleanup
Use the fourcc header instead of redefining it inside the code
Fix Get/Set Port Attribute logic
Return BadMatch if a Port Attribute is not found
Provide a more consistent message if FBUF fails
Fix arguments
Hi Alex,
Em 11-02-2011 15:37, Alex Deucher escreveu:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mche...@redhat.com wrote:
This is the second version of my backport patches. To avoid spending
people's time on looking at lines that have only whitespace changes,
I broke the patch I
I'm currently working on make xawtv and xf86-video-v4l fully functional, in
order to
allow us to test the overlay part of the V4L2 API.
I just sent a big patch replacing the old API to the new one, so the driver
should be
working now. However, only a very few set of drivers will benefit from
Hi Thierry,
Em 08-02-2011 08:12, Thierry Vignaud escreveu:
On 8 February 2011 10:42, Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com wrote:
@@ -57,16 +65,16 @@ static MODULESETUPPROTO(v4lSetup);
static XF86ModuleVersionInfo v4lVersRec =
{
-v4l,
-MODULEVENDORSTRING
Hi Thierry,
Em 08-02-2011 08:12, Thierry Vignaud escreveu:
On 8 February 2011 10:42, Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com wrote:
@@ -57,16 +65,16 @@ static MODULESETUPPROTO(v4lSetup);
static XF86ModuleVersionInfo v4lVersRec =
{
-v4l,
-MODULEVENDORSTRING
);
return (char *) (*privates) + key-offset;
}
As nobody registered it, key-initialized is FALSE, and assert will
complain, causing the crash.
More information is available on this bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675532
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche
I'm currently working on make xawtv and xf86-video-v4l fully functional, in
order to
allow us to test the overlay part of the V4L2 API.
I just sent a big patch replacing the old API to the new one, so the driver
should be
working now. However, only a very few set of drivers will benefit from
25 matches
Mail list logo
