And it still takes that long?ouch.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> The max heap size was set to 2G.
>
> On Oct 9, 2010, at 21:37, Matt Dew wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>> As mentioned earlier in the thread, it fails to buil
The max heap size was set to 2G.
On Oct 9, 2010, at 21:37, Matt Dew wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> As mentioned earlier in the thread, it fails to build without upping the
>> heap...
>>
>> The point is that it should take NO time to build because it should
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> As mentioned earlier in the thread, it fails to build without upping the
> heap...
>
> The point is that it should take NO time to build because it shouldn't be
> rebuilding the documentation every time.
True, but when it does build, it
As mentioned earlier in the thread, it fails to build without upping the heap...
The point is that it should take NO time to build because it shouldn't be
rebuilding the documentation every time.
On Oct 9, 2010, at 16:53, Matt Dew wrote:
> Jeremy,
> Does the build time go down if you up Java's
Jeremy,
Does the build time go down if you up Java's heap for fop?
export FOP_OPTS='-Xmx512m
Matt
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> Where did this go? I thought I saw a patch, but it's not pushed, and now I
> can't find it. libX11 takes 2h20m to build/install on my
Where did this go? I thought I saw a patch, but it's not pushed, and
now I can't find it. libX11 takes 2h20m to build/install on my G5
when there are no changes:
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2010-10-07-0019/logs/libX11/
On Oct 3, 2010, at 09:38, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Dan Nicholson wro
Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> .pre:
>>> @dir=`echo $@ | sed 's,\(.*\)/.*,\1,'`; $(MKDIR_P) $$dir
>> Shouldn't this be able to be simplified to just:
>>@$(MKDIR_P) $(@D)
>>
>> I thought we previously determined that was portable to all the versions
>> of make people used.
>
> I thought that
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Jeremy Huddleston
>> wrote:
>>> Also of note... My G5 took an hour and a half just to 'make install' with
>>> these changes. It looks like it's redoing some things in 'make install
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> Also of note... My G5 took an hour and a half just to 'make install' with
>> these changes. It looks like it's redoing some things in 'make install'
>> that it already did in 'make':
>>
>> http://tinderbox.x.org/b
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> Also of note... My G5 took an hour and a half just to 'make install' with
> these changes. It looks like it's redoing some things in 'make install'
> that it already did in 'make':
>
> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2010-09-30-0022/
One
Also of note... My G5 took an hour and a half just to 'make install'
with these changes. It looks like it's redoing some things in 'make
install' that it already did in 'make':
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2010-09-30-0022/
On Sep 29, 2010, at 09:31, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Matt Dew wrote
Matt Dew wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Younes Manton wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Jeremy Huddleston
>> wrote:
>>> This change seems to be causing documentation to fail building on yuffie due
>>> to java running out of memory…
>>> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2010-09-22
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Younes Manton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> This change seems to be causing documentation to fail building on yuffie due
>> to java running out of memory…
>> http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2010-09-22-0004/logs/libX11/#build
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
