Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:25:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Apparently MeeGo does automatic packaging based on configure.ac, so > Arjan requested that these be added to make that easier. So we're adding fictional dependencies based on meego brokenness? Do you have more details on the issues the

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:44:39PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:25:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Apparently MeeGo does automatic packaging based on configure.ac, so > > Arjan requested that these be added to make that easier. > > So we're adding fictional depe

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:00:28 +0100 Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:44:39PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:25:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > Apparently MeeGo does automatic packaging based on configure.ac, so > > > Arjan requested that th

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:00:28 +0100 Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:44:39PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:25:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > Apparently MeeGo does automatic packaging based on configure.ac, so > > > Arjan requested that th

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:34:01AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:00:28 +0100 > Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:44:39PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:25:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > Apparently MeeGo does automatic pac

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 17:39:11 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > In file included from /usr/include/xorg/scrnintstr.h:58:0, > > from /usr/include/xorg/xf86str.h:39, > > from /usr/include/xorg/xf86.h:46, > > from uxa-priv.h:37, > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:39:11 +0100 Daniel Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:34:01AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:00:28 +0100 > > Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:44:39PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:25:13 -07

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Gaetan Nadon
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 18:47 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > The GL one is more annoying. > glproto includes gl.h which is in the mesa source. The mesa package depends on glproto. This will become a circular dependency if glproto is fixed to depend on gl. I was surprised to see a protocol includin

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-28 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:34:01 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > and glproto is missing a dep on GL: > > In file included from i810.h:60:0, > from i810_accel.c:41: > /usr/include/GL/glxint.h:36:19: fatal error: GL/gl.h: No such file or > directory >From memory, I think this is jus

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-28 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:34:01 -0700, Jesse Barnes > wrote: >> and glproto is missing a dep on GL: >> >> In file included from i810.h:60:0, >>                  from i810_accel.c:41: >> /usr/include/GL/glxint.h:36:19: fatal error: GL/gl.h: N