Reviewed-by: Axel Davy
BTW, I've just sent a patch to fix the PresentOptionAsync
behaviour (we want to use sync flips when target_msc is above crtc_msc).
It should arrive soon, it awaits moderation approval.
On 28/10/2015 11:39, Jammy Zhou wrote:
It is according to the
...@ens.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 4:19 PM
To: Zhou, Jammy; xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] present: Execute right away if target_msc equals
current_msc
Reviewed-by: Axel Davy <axel.d...@ens.fr>
BTW, I've just sent a patch to fix the PresentOptionAsync behaviour (we want t
ent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 4:19 PM
To: Zhou, Jammy; xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] present: Execute right away if target_msc equals
current_msc
Reviewed-by: Axel Davy <axel.d...@ens.fr>
BTW, I've just sent a patch to fix the PresentOptionAsync behaviour (we want to
use sync f
3:42 PM
To: Michel Dänzer; Zhou, Jammy
Cc:xorg-devel@lists.x.org <mailto:xorg-devel@lists.x.org>; Mario Kleiner
Subject: Re: [PATCH] present: Execute right away if target_msc equals
current_msc
Hi,
What is the current conscensus fo
<mailto:xorg-devel@lists.x.org>; Mario Kleiner
Subject: Re: [PATCH] present: Execute right away if target_msc equals
current_msc
Hi,
What is the current conscensus for how should PresentOptionAsync work ?
If I remember correctly, the semantic used to be:
. if we present at the curre
]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:42 PM
To: Michel Dänzer; Zhou, Jammy
Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; Mario Kleiner
Subject: Re: [PATCH] present: Execute right away if target_msc equals
current_msc
Hi,
What is the current conscensus for how should PresentOptionAsync work ?
If I remember correctly
e
background about this?
Regards,
Jammy
-Original Message-
From: Axel Davy [mailto:axel.d...@ens.fr]
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 4:45 PM
To: Zhou, Jammy; Michel Dänzer
Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; Mario Kleiner
Subject: Re: [PATCH] present: Execute right away if target_msc equals
cu
Regards,
Jammy
-Original Message-
From: Axel Davy [mailto:axel.d...@ens.fr]
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2015 4:45 PM
To: Zhou, Jammy; Michel Dänzer
Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; Mario Kleiner
Subject: Re: [PATCH] present: Execute right away if target_msc equals
current_msc
Hi,
As you
for the next vblank?
Regards,
Jammy
-Original Message-
From: Axel Davy [mailto:axel.d...@ens.fr]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:42 PM
To: Michel Dänzer; Zhou, Jammy
Cc: xorg-devel@lists.x.org; Mario Kleiner
Subject: Re: [PATCH] present: Execute right away if target_msc equals
Hi,
What is the current conscensus for how should PresentOptionAsync work ?
If I remember correctly, the semantic used to be:
. if we present at the current or past msc with the flag, two options:
-> if the ddx doesn't support async swap, we do copy to the screen
pixmap right away
-> if the
It is according to the protocol:
"If 'options' contains PresentOptionAsync, and the 'target-msc'
is less than or equal to the current msc for 'window', then
the operation will be performed as soon as possible, not
necessarily waiting for the next vertical blank interval."
Signed-off-by: Jammy
On 28.10.2015 19:39, Jammy Zhou wrote:
> It is according to the protocol:
>
> "If 'options' contains PresentOptionAsync, and the 'target-msc'
> is less than or equal to the current msc for 'window', then
> the operation will be performed as soon as possible, not
> necessarily waiting for the next
12 matches
Mail list logo