Was there ever an updated version of this patch? This one seems to have bitrot.
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:09, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:49:58 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>
>> I think it would be nicer if the patch removed the bogus assignments
>> which are still there.
>
> Ar
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:49:58 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> I think it would be nicer if the patch removed the bogus assignments
> which are still there.
Are you going to update this patch? Or do you like it the way it is?
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp6DAp9OBT4X.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:29:01 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Previous code assumed we were always 32bpp, so root window paint walked
> off the end of the XImage and things went boom.
My brain is small today; I looked at this patch and had to go read the
code very carefully as it looks like it jus
Previous code assumed we were always 32bpp, so root window paint walked
off the end of the XImage and things went boom.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
hw/kdrive/ephyr/ephyr.c |3 ++-
hw/kdrive/ephyr/hostx.c |7 ---
hw/kdrive/ephyr/hostx.h |3 ++-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
