Re: [PATCH] xfree86: Keep a non-seat0 X server from touching VTs (#71258)

2013-11-11 Thread Laércio de Sousa
Hi David, I'm currently using this patch with a dual-seat system consisting of a primary Intel onboard video chip and a secondary Silicon Motion SM501 graphics card with no DRM/KMS drivers available (much like a NVIDIA card with proprietary drivers). At the moment, I've observed no problems at

Re: [PATCH] xfree86: Keep a non-seat0 X server from touching VTs (#71258)

2013-11-11 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Laércio de Sousa lbsous...@gmail.com wrote: This is my first atempt to block VT access to non-seat0 X servers. If -seat option is passed with a value different from seat0, X server won't call xf86OpenConsole(). This is needed to avoid any race condition

[PATCH] xfree86: Keep a non-seat0 X server from touching VTs (#71258)

2013-11-07 Thread Laércio de Sousa
This is my first atempt to block VT access to non-seat0 X servers. If -seat option is passed with a value different from seat0, X server won't call xf86OpenConsole(). This is needed to avoid any race condition between seat0 and non-seat0 X servers. If a non-seat0 X server opens a given VT before