On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:47:32AM +0100, Andreas Wettstein wrote:
> > is there some sort of test-case that triggers this issue reliable?
>
> I found it when I tried:
>
> key {
> type= "ONE_LEVEL",
> symbols[Group1]= [ NoSymbol ],
> actions[Group1]= [ LatchGroup(group=-1
> is there some sort of test-case that triggers this issue reliable?
I found it when I tried:
key {
type= "ONE_LEVEL",
symbols[Group1]= [ NoSymbol ],
actions[Group1]= [ LatchGroup(group=-1, clearLocks) ]
};
and then hit F7. Using SetGroup(group=-1) should "work" equall
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 06:13:21PM +0100, Andreas Wettstein wrote:
> The base group is not brought into range and, therefore, using it as an array
> index crashed the X server. Also, at this place, we should ignore locked
> groups, but not latched groups. Therefore, use sum of base and latched
>
The base group is not brought into range and, therefore, using it as an array
index crashed the X server. Also, at this place, we should ignore locked
groups, but not latched groups. Therefore, use sum of base and latched groups,
brought into range.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Wettstein
---
xkb/xkb
