Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfree86/loader: Do not unload sibling modules.

2012-08-07 Thread Michal Suchanek
Ping? ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfree86/loader: Do not unload sibling modules.

2012-08-07 Thread Keith Packard
Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com writes: Ping? I'm not getting the feeling that this is resolving a known bug, so I think it should wait for X server 1.14 at this point. -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgpx3l2pNuqKs.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfree86/loader: Do not unload sibling modules.

2012-08-07 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 03:51:18PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com writes: Ping? I'm not getting the feeling that this is resolving a known bug, so I think it should wait for X server 1.14 at this point. Yes, I won't get to review this in time for 1.13,

[PATCH 1/7] xfree86/loader: Do not unload sibling modules.

2012-07-23 Thread Michal Suchanek
Ordering of sibling modules is internal to the loader implementation. Unloading siblings following the requested module in the sibling list leads to unexpected unloading of seemingly random modules. Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com --- hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c |6 +++---