Hi,
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 05:04:59PM +0200, Simon Thum wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 04:59 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Instead of passing a set of int* to the acceleration code, pass it a
> > mask instead, which avoids an unfortunate loss of precision.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
> > ---
> >
On 06/03/2011 04:59 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Instead of passing a set of int* to the acceleration code, pass it a
> mask instead, which avoids an unfortunate loss of precision.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
> ---
> dix/getevents.c | 41 +---
> dix/ptrveloc.c | 82
Instead of passing a set of int* to the acceleration code, pass it a
mask instead, which avoids an unfortunate loss of precision.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
---
dix/getevents.c | 41 +---
dix/ptrveloc.c | 82 ---
2
