On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 16:25 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Adam Jackson writes:
>
> > Can we consider coming up with a heuristic for the oldest server version
> > that current git versions of drivers will continue to support? The
> > amount of #ifdef in the drivers is getting a bit absurd, and it
Adam Jackson writes:
> Can we consider coming up with a heuristic for the oldest server version
> that current git versions of drivers will continue to support? The
> amount of #ifdef in the drivers is getting a bit absurd, and it's a bit
> disingenuous to pretend our support goes back as far as
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:49 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Mark Kettenis writes:
>
> >> From: Adam Jackson
> >> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:37:34 -0400
> >>
> >> No driver is using these, as far as I know.
> >
> > The xf86-video-mga driver uses these, but only if DISABLE_VGA_IO is
> > defined, and
Mark Kettenis writes:
>> From: Adam Jackson
>> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:37:34 -0400
>>
>> No driver is using these, as far as I know.
>
> The xf86-video-mga driver uses these, but only if DISABLE_VGA_IO is
> defined, and by default it isn't, and there is no configure option to
> turn it on.
>
> From: Adam Jackson
> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:37:34 -0400
>
> No driver is using these, as far as I know.
The xf86-video-mga driver uses these, but only if DISABLE_VGA_IO is
defined, and by default it isn't, and there is no configure option to
turn it on.
I'm a bit worried about silently ign
No driver is using these, as far as I know.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86.h | 3 ---
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.c| 41 -
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Bus.h| 4
hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c | 4
hw/xfree86/commo
