[PATCH 5/7] glamor: Provide a fallback path for using an index buffer to do quads.

2015-06-19 Thread Eric Anholt
Improves x11perf -aa10text performance by 1377.59% +/- 23.8198% (n=93) on Intel with GLES2. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt --- glamor/glamor.c | 62 +++ glamor/glamor_priv.h | 11 + glamor/glamor_utils.h | 4 +--- 3 files changed, 74 in

Re: [PATCH 5/7] glamor: Provide a fallback path for using an index buffer to do quads.

2015-06-25 Thread Dave Airlie
On 20 June 2015 at 12:09, Eric Anholt wrote: > Improves x11perf -aa10text performance by 1377.59% +/- 23.8198% (n=93) > on Intel with GLES2. > Do we destroy glamor_priv->ib anywhere? Other than that, this seems sane, it might be nice to have more structured index buffer support if we need to use

Re: [PATCH 5/7] glamor: Provide a fallback path for using an index buffer to do quads.

2015-06-27 Thread Eric Anholt
Dave Airlie writes: > On 20 June 2015 at 12:09, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Improves x11perf -aa10text performance by 1377.59% +/- 23.8198% (n=93) >> on Intel with GLES2. >> > > Do we destroy glamor_priv->ib anywhere? > > Other than that, this seems sane, it might be nice to have more structured > in

Re: [PATCH 5/7] glamor: Provide a fallback path for using an index buffer to do quads.

2015-06-29 Thread Dave Airlie
On 28 June 2015 at 12:28, Eric Anholt wrote: > Dave Airlie writes: > >> On 20 June 2015 at 12:09, Eric Anholt wrote: >>> Improves x11perf -aa10text performance by 1377.59% +/- 23.8198% (n=93) >>> on Intel with GLES2. >>> >> >> Do we destroy glamor_priv->ib anywhere? >> >> Other than that, this s