Pat Kane wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> > ... James doesn't have an fd.o account, so I'll push them on his behalf.
>
> How does one get an fd.o account these days? I've tried a couple of
> times with out luck[1].
Process hasn't really changed in years - see
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Aaron Plattner wrote:
> ... James doesn't have an fd.o account, so I'll push them on his behalf.
How does one get an fd.o account these days? I've tried a couple of
times with out luck[1].
Pat
---
[1] I just assumed the fd.o bogon-filters sent my requests to
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:02:49PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:58:58 -0800, James Jones wrote:
>
> > OK, I've pushed the requested updates to proto and lib with your
> > reviewed-by
> > line to my github repositories. Once I get a review for the Xext changes,
> > I'll
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:58:58 -0800, James Jones wrote:
> OK, I've pushed the requested updates to proto and lib with your reviewed-by
> line to my github repositories. Once I get a review for the Xext changes,
> I'll send out all the pull requests. Thanks for reviewing!
Note that for everythi
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:05:05 -0800, James Jones wrote:
> OK, to be clear, you want me to skip protocol version 1.2 entirely and
> document it as version 1.3? Thanks for reviewing!
Yeah, we've got lots of integers, so there's no sense doing anything
that might be confusing. Library versions shou
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:21:19 -0800, James Jones wrote:
> Signed-off-by: James Jones
> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Loup Griffais
> Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner
> Reviewed-by: Robert Morell
> ---
> damageproto.txt | 57 +-
> 1 files changed, 55 insert
Signed-off-by: James Jones
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Loup Griffais
Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner
Reviewed-by: Robert Morell
---
damageproto.txt | 57 +-
1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/damageproto.txt b/damageproto.t
