Peter Hutterer (03/12/2010):
> the usual set of patches, should be pretty familiar to reviewers
> now. again untested because I don't have a device.
Untested as well.
First 9 patches applied incrementally on top of master, led to
successful builds against 1.9; the last one fails due to a missing
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:18:57PM -0500, Gaetan Nadon wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 09:10 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> > the usual set of patches, should be pretty familiar to reviewers now. again
> > untested because I don't have a device.
> >
>
> Should it be added to build.sh?
oh, no.
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 09:10 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> the usual set of patches, should be pretty familiar to reviewers now. again
> untested because I don't have a device.
>
Should it be added to build.sh?
COPYING needs an update.
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> __
the usual set of patches, should be pretty familiar to reviewers now. again
untested because I don't have a device.
Cheers,
Peter
___
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/m
