Re: [PATCH sis] Use miPointerSetPosition, not miPointerAbsoluteCursor

2012-01-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Huddleston Sent from my iPad On Jan 3, 2012, at 19:26, Peter Hutterer wrote: > miPointerAbsoluteCursor was removed in '09. > > Technically this shouldn't just work on the VCP since any master pointer may > end up in the dead area. However, I suspect the Venn diagramm of MP

[PATCH sis] Use miPointerSetPosition, not miPointerAbsoluteCursor

2012-01-03 Thread Peter Hutterer
miPointerAbsoluteCursor was removed in '09. Technically this shouldn't just work on the VCP since any master pointer may end up in the dead area. However, I suspect the Venn diagramm of MPX users and sis merged framebuffer users shows little overlap. miPointerSetPosition's prototype changed a few

Re: [PATCH sis] Use miPointerSetPosition, not miPointerAbsoluteCursor

2011-11-01 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:20:15PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > Does this need ifdef based on some ABI version? yes, it does. several even, but until the two-screen-coordinates stuff is merged I can't fix this since it'll change again then. so ignore this patch for now pls. Cheers, Peter

Re: [PATCH sis] Use miPointerSetPosition, not miPointerAbsoluteCursor

2011-10-30 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
Does this need ifdef based on some ABI version? On Oct 30, 2011, at 22:49, Peter Hutterer wrote: > Technically this shouldn't just work on the VCP since any master pointer may > end up in the dead area. However, I suspect the Venn diagramm of MPX users > and sis merged framebuffer users shows lit

[PATCH sis] Use miPointerSetPosition, not miPointerAbsoluteCursor

2011-10-30 Thread Peter Hutterer
Technically this shouldn't just work on the VCP since any master pointer may end up in the dead area. However, I suspect the Venn diagramm of MPX users and sis merged framebuffer users shows little overlap. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- src/sis_driver.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertio