On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
What is the outcome of this patch? I mean, does it actually fix
something visible, instead of a potential problem?
x86emu in it's current state is unable to emulate correctly 16bit code that
has been produced by GCC.
This
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Julian Pidancet
julian.pidan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Julian Pidancet
julian.pidan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Guillem Jover guil...@hadrons.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 00:02:55 +, Julian Pidancet
What is the outcome of this patch? I mean, does it actually fix
something visible, instead of a potential problem?
[]
Anyone interested in this ? Is there a maintainer for x86emu ? The
MAINTAINERS file in xorg-docs doesn't mention anything about it.
CCed: Adam Jackson
Adam, you seem to be
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Guillem Jover guil...@hadrons.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 00:02:55 +, Julian Pidancet wrote:
Some instructions are not emulated correctly by x86emu when they
are prefixed by the 0x66 opcode.
I've identified problems in the emulation of these
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Julian Pidancet
julian.pidan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Guillem Jover guil...@hadrons.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 00:02:55 +, Julian Pidancet wrote:
Some instructions are not emulated correctly by x86emu when they
are prefixed
Some instructions are not emulated correctly by x86emu when they
are prefixed by the 0x66 opcode.
I've identified problems in the emulation of these intructions: ret,
enter, leave, iret and some forms of call.
Most of the time, the problem is that these instructions should push or
pop 32-bit
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 00:02:55 +, Julian Pidancet wrote:
Some instructions are not emulated correctly by x86emu when they
are prefixed by the 0x66 opcode.
I've identified problems in the emulation of these intructions: ret,
enter, leave, iret and some forms of call.
Most of the time,
