On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 23:21:31 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> If you break it all out into separate utility functions in os/ or dix/
> (e.g. [0] or similar) and document the result at least in the header
> file you add it to, I'll even test it. :)
>
See attached patches. Patch #1 adds x_sha1_{in
Le 15/10/2009 00:47, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 23:21:31 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
>> If you break it all out into separate utility functions in os/ or dix/
>> (e.g. [0] or similar) and document the result at least in the header
>> file you add it to, I'll even test it. :
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 00:47:25 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 23:21:31 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > If you break it all out into separate utility functions in os/ or dix/
> > (e.g. [0] or similar) and document the result at least in the header
> > file you add it to,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 00:47:25 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 23:21:31 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>
>>> If you break it all out into separate utility functions in os/ or dix/
>>> (e.g. [0] or similar) and document the result at least in the hea
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 00:47:25 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 23:21:31 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>>
If you break it all out into separate utility functions in os/ or dix/
(e.g. [0] or similar) and document t
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:58:04PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 00:47:25 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 23:21:31 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > If you break it all out into separate utility functions in os/ or dix/
> > > (e.g. [0] or similar) an