Re: [PATCH xextproto] Death to Multibuffer extension

2010-03-31 Thread Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 06:58:28PM +0200, ext Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Isn't removing the headers from xextproto going to break the build of > libXext & older Xservers? > > (No, you can't delete functions from libXext - we don't break client > library ABI like that. This is why we also no long

Re: [PATCH xextproto] Death to Multibuffer extension

2010-03-30 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Isn't removing the headers from xextproto going to break the build of libXext & older Xservers? (No, you can't delete functions from libXext - we don't break client library ABI like that. This is why we also no longer add new extensions to libXext, so we're not left with unused appendixes fore

[PATCH xextproto] Death to Multibuffer extension

2010-03-30 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti --- Makefile.am |2 - multibufconst.h | 83 multibufproto.h | 295 --- 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 380 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 multibufconst.h delete mode 100644 multibufp