Re: [PATCH xserver] glamor: Isolate GLX client code to its own library

2016-10-18 Thread Eric Anholt
Adam Jackson writes: > This is a step towards making libglamor_egl and Xwayland not link > against libGL (which brings in client-side libraries, which is just > icky). Is it actually necessary? Given that the epoxy GLX symbols always exist, and we're linking against epoxy, it seems like we coul

[PATCH xserver] glamor: Isolate GLX client code to its own library

2016-10-18 Thread Adam Jackson
This is a step towards making libglamor_egl and Xwayland not link against libGL (which brings in client-side libraries, which is just icky). Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson --- glamor/Makefile.am | 13 +++-- glamor/glamor_glx_stubs.c | 37 + hw/