Hello Hans,
On 29.09.2016 09:56, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 28-09-16 16:54, Michael Thayer wrote:
Hello Hans,
On 28.09.2016 15:37, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 28-09-16 14:47, Michael Thayer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to l
Hi,
On 28-09-16 16:54, Michael Thayer wrote:
Hello Hans,
On 28.09.2016 15:37, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 28-09-16 14:47, Michael Thayer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed u
Hello Hans,
On 28.09.2016 15:37, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 28-09-16 14:47, Michael Thayer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed up by a request to show it if we
report success,
Hi Michael,
On 28-09-16 14:47, Michael Thayer wrote:
Hello,
On 28.09.2016 09:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 28-09-16 05:05, Michel Dänzer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed up by a
Hello,
On 28.09.2016 09:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 28-09-16 05:05, Michel Dänzer wrote:
[...]
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed up by a request to show it if we
report success, or to hide it
Hi,
On 28-09-16 05:05, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 27/09/16 10:54 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
On 27.09.2016 12:06, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 27/09/16 10:54 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
>> On 27.09.2016 12:06, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
> When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor
On 27/09/16 10:54 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
> On 27.09.2016 12:06, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that
request is always followed up by a request to show
Hello,
On 27.09.2016 12:06, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that request is
always
followed up by a request to show it if we report success, or to hide
Hi,
On 23-09-16 10:20, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that request is always
followed up by a request to show it if we report success, or to hide it if
we report failure. Therefore it makes no sen
Hi All,
On 09/16/2016 06:52 PM, Michael Thayer wrote:
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that request is always
followed up by a request to show it if we report success, or to hide it if
we report failure. Therefore it makes no sense to suppress the request if
the cursor is no
When the X server asks us to load a hardware cursor, that request is always
followed up by a request to show it if we report success, or to hide it if
we report failure. Therefore it makes no sense to suppress the request if
the cursor is not currently visible.
Signed-off-by: Michael Thayer
---
12 matches
Mail list logo