Pekka Paalanen writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 11:55:15 -0700
> Eric Anholt wrote:
>
>> ---
>>
>> Pekka - that link didn't help, because we still need a correct
>> "result" value. I don't believe that the compiler could break
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 11:55:15 -0700
Eric Anholt wrote:
> ---
>
> Pekka - that link didn't help, because we still need a correct
> "result" value. I don't believe that the compiler could break uint ->
> int conversions with the high bit, but here's the patch I think we
> would
---
Pekka - that link didn't help, because we still need a correct
"result" value. I don't believe that the compiler could break uint ->
int conversions with the high bit, but here's the patch I think we
would need for that. I still think v1 is the better version.
include/misc.h | 21