On 23/09/16 11:08 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 22/09/16 05:45 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> The copy optimization in d37329cba42fa8e72fe4be8a7be18e512268b5bd
>> replicated a bug from last time we did a copy optimization, and didn't
>> get rendercheck run on it. This is effectively a re-cherry-pick
On 22/09/16 05:45 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The copy optimization in d37329cba42fa8e72fe4be8a7be18e512268b5bd
> replicated a bug from last time we did a copy optimization, and didn't
> get rendercheck run on it. This is effectively a re-cherry-pick of
> 510c8605641803f1f5b5d2de6d3bb422b148e0e7.
>
The copy optimization in d37329cba42fa8e72fe4be8a7be18e512268b5bd
replicated a bug from last time we did a copy optimization, and didn't
get rendercheck run on it. This is effectively a re-cherry-pick of
510c8605641803f1f5b5d2de6d3bb422b148e0e7.
Fixes rendercheck -t blend -o src -f