Re: [PATCH xserver 10/11] glamor: Delay making pixmaps shareable until we need to.

2015-11-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 07.11.2015 05:52, Eric Anholt wrote: > If a pixmap isn't getting exported as a dmabuf, then we don't need to > go the GBM route for it. This should reduce normal pixmap allocation > overhead, and also lets the driver choose non-scanout formats which > may be much higher performance. > > On

[PATCH xserver 10/11] glamor: Delay making pixmaps shareable until we need to.

2015-11-06 Thread Eric Anholt
If a pixmap isn't getting exported as a dmabuf, then we don't need to go the GBM route for it. This should reduce normal pixmap allocation overhead, and also lets the driver choose non-scanout formats which may be much higher performance. On Raspberry Pi, where scanout isn't usable as a texture