Adam Jackson writes:
> Consistency and cleanliness? They're the only out-of-lined reply swap
> functions which puts them solidly in the minority (seven out of GLX's
> 32ish replies), and glxserver.h is currently kind of a misc-and-other
> header that I was trying to give some focus.
Ok, seems fi
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 15:00 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Adam Jackson writes:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
>
> Why? I can see removing the WriteToClient calls from the functions, but
> any particular reason to inline them?
Consistency and cleanliness? They're the only out-of-lined reply
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson
---
glx/glxcmds.c | 68 ++-
glx/glxcmdsswap.c | 103 --
glx/glxserver.h | 22
3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glx/glxcmds.c b/glx/
