Re: [PULL] tables initialization and DISPATCH_PROC usage removal

2010-09-28 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:28:19 +0300, "Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)" wrote: > try again now, please. Merged. 58bd317..e416965 master -> master -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgprvCSYpqEG6.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.

Re: [PULL] tables initialization and DISPATCH_PROC usage removal

2010-09-28 Thread Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:37:52PM +0200, ext Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:50:48 +0300, Tiago Vignatti > wrote: > > > Please pull Keith. Thank you, > > I'm still seeing build errors from this patch: > > xf86vmode.c: In function ‘XFree86VidModeExtensionInit’: > xf86vmode.c:157:

Re: [PULL] tables initialization and DISPATCH_PROC usage removal

2010-09-27 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:50:48 +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > Please pull Keith. Thank you, I'm still seeing build errors from this patch: xf86vmode.c: In function ‘XFree86VidModeExtensionInit’: xf86vmode.c:157: error: ‘ProcXF86VidModeDispatch’ undeclared (first use in this function) xf86vmode.

Re: [PULL] tables initialization and DISPATCH_PROC usage removal

2010-09-27 Thread Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:25:06AM +0200, ext Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:50:48 +0300, Tiago Vignatti > wrote: > > > Although there are two commits only in this set without functional changes, > > they touch quite a lot of code, so I preferred to send to you soon before > > th

Re: [PULL] tables initialization and DISPATCH_PROC usage removal

2010-09-23 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:50:48 +0300, Tiago Vignatti wrote: > Although there are two commits only in this set without functional changes, > they touch quite a lot of code, so I preferred to send to you soon before they > get outdated again :) Perhaps they're already stale? xcmisc.c:202: warning:

[PULL] tables initialization and DISPATCH_PROC usage removal

2010-09-14 Thread Tiago Vignatti
Although there are two commits only in this set without functional changes, they touch quite a lot of code, so I preferred to send to you soon before they get outdated again :) Please pull Keith. Thank you, Tiago The following changes since commit c768cdda92696b636c10bb2df64167d5274b