Re: [RFC] [PATCH] [xorg/xserver] damage: use DamageExtReport for the initial borderClip damage report

2011-04-11 Thread Erkki Seppala
On 24.03.2011 15:41, Adam Jackson wrote: There's still one semantic difference between this and the original: you're not adding the initial region to the Damage. I'm not completely sure if that matters in any existing app, but it's probably better to assume it does. It looks like damageRepor

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] [xorg/xserver] damage: use DamageExtReport for the initial borderClip damage report

2011-03-24 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 13:46 +0200, Erkki Seppälä wrote: > Instead of using the "proper" DamageDamageRegion for reporting the > first (virtual) damage in ProcDamageCreate that covers the borderClip > of the drawable window, use DamageExtReport directly. This avoids > sending all other damage listene

[RFC] [PATCH] [xorg/xserver] damage: use DamageExtReport for the initial borderClip damage report

2011-03-24 Thread Erkki Seppälä
Instead of using the "proper" DamageDamageRegion for reporting the first (virtual) damage in ProcDamageCreate that covers the borderClip of the drawable window, use DamageExtReport directly. This avoids sending all other damage listeners from receiving a full window update when a new damage object