Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Extend block and wakeup handling to cover writes as well

2015-09-26 Thread Keith Packard
Pierre Ossman writes: > Ping. Still in the list? :) Did you see my recent patches that add a new API for file descriptor monitoring? -- -keith signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Extend block and wakeup handling to cover writes as well

2015-09-25 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:25:48 -0800 Keith Packard wrote: > Pierre Ossman writes: > > > Great. Can it get queued up for the next releases in that case? > > It's in my list, yes. > Ping. Still in the list? :) Rgds -- Pierre Ossman Software

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Extend block and wakeup handling to cover writes as well

2015-01-26 Thread Keith Packard
Pierre Ossman oss...@cendio.se writes: Great. Can it get queued up for the next releases in that case? It's in my list, yes. -- -keith signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives:

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Extend block and wakeup handling to cover writes as well

2015-01-26 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:35:04 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: Pierre Ossman oss...@cendio.se writes: On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 13:55:13 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: Pierre Ossman oss...@cendio.se writes: Please see the attached patch and see if this seems like a reasonable way to solve

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Extend block and wakeup handling to cover writes as well

2015-01-23 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 13:55:13 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: Pierre Ossman oss...@cendio.se writes: Please see the attached patch and see if this seems like a reasonable way to solve this. I thought about changing the BlockHandlerProc definition, but it is exposed in application headers so

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Extend block and wakeup handling to cover writes as well

2014-12-25 Thread Keith Packard
Pierre Ossman oss...@cendio.se writes: Please see the attached patch and see if this seems like a reasonable way to solve this. I thought about changing the BlockHandlerProc definition, but it is exposed in application headers so it didn't seem safe to touch. I think we should just change

[RFC] [PATCH] Extend block and wakeup handling to cover writes as well

2014-12-19 Thread Pierre Ossman
For TigerVNC we need to ability to gracefully wait for a client socket to become writeable again. Right now we have to either patch the Xorg code, or resort to polling. I'd very much prefer if we could hook into the main select loop properly. :) Please see the attached patch and see if this seems