[RFC PATCH 0/9] Bus layer cleanups

2010-09-21 Thread Adam Jackson
This attempts to tackle Tiago's (justified) hatred for the IOADDRESS type in a slightly more elegant way. We move more of the VGA hacks to vgahw, port it and int10 over to pciaccess' legacy I/O API, and then clean up some of the remaining detritus. THIS IS AN ABI BREAK. Like, a pretty massive on

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Bus layer cleanups

2011-09-14 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
I'm interested in this patch series since I'm working to get Xorg building on darwin and need to get the IOADDRESS type of shared code. This is a pre-req for Tiago's --enable-pciaccess changes which I've rebased on recent master. This series still applies except for the following: [PATCH 5/9] v

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Bus layer cleanups

2010-09-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > This attempts to tackle Tiago's (justified) hatred for the IOADDRESS type > in a slightly more elegant way.  We move more of the VGA hacks to vgahw, > port it and int10 over to pciaccess' legacy I/O API, and then clean up > some of the remaini

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] Bus layer cleanups

2010-09-22 Thread Tiago Vignatti
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:28:30AM +0200, ext Adam Jackson wrote: > This attempts to tackle Tiago's (justified) hatred for the IOADDRESS type > in a slightly more elegant way. much appreciated, ajax! > THIS IS AN ABI BREAK. Like, a pretty massive one. Please do not pull > this yet. I'm mostl