On 07.11.2013 04:45, Keith Packard wrote:
> I've generated a new sequence of patches in response to the very
> helpful review comments received so far. Thanks to all involved!
>
> Some simple cleanups that I have found useful. Patch 3/8 has been
> split out from the event queue patch and matches a
Uli Schlachter writes:
> Oh, this means we also need a new xcb-proto release. That should have been
> clear
> to anyone thinking about all of this for 0.5 seconds, but I totally missed
> that.
> This means we need to bump our minimum required version of xcb-proto
> in libxcb.
I'm easy; I can p
Uli Schlachter writes:
> All the patches except for patch 4 (with my comments included and tabs
> removed):
I think I'm all set; I've rebased to 1.9 (adding some master patches
which make it compile with new xproto).
What else would you like to see in the send_fd patch?
--
keith.pack...@intel
On 07.11.2013 14:38, Keith Packard wrote:
> Uli Schlachter writes:
>
>> All the patches except for patch 4 (with my comments included and tabs
>> removed):
>
> I think I'm all set; I've rebased to 1.9 (adding some master patches
> which make it compile with new xproto).
Thanks. If no one else c
Uli Schlachter writes:
> So no more complaints from me and sorry for being annoying. :-)
Thanks very much for your review; it was helpful and I think we've got a
better library as a result. I'll go ahead and push out a 1.9.2 that has
this new stuff.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgp8flDbOXp07.p
