...@lists.x.org; xorg-devel@lists.x.org
> Subject: Re: [Xorg-driver-geode] Rendering in geode
>
> On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 16:47 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote:
> > You know when the driver does the composite, it is called in
> > exaTryDriverComposite() function. You guess w
org-driver-geode] Rendering in geode
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:29 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote:
> I have some understanding about your explanation. Is that to say if
> the source pixel is out of the source image, the modulus operation
> will be used to get the source pixel to to rendered, not
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:29 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote:
> I have some understanding about your explanation. Is that to say if
> the source pixel is out of the source image, the modulus operation
> will be used to get the source pixel to to rendered, not for the
> rendering region.
> Take my exampl
s equally to mask images if present.
The resulting pixel is then applied to the blend operation.
-Original Message-
From: Huang, FrankR
Sent: 2010?7?12? 9:52
To: 'Jonathan Morton'
Cc: xorg-driver-ge...@lists.x.org; xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Subject: RE: [Xorg-driver-geode] Renderi
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 09:52 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote:
> picture_10x10[0].pict = XRenderCreatePicture(dpy,
> picture_10x10[0].d, picture_10x10[0].format, CPRepeat, &pa);
> XRenderComposite(dpy, PictOpOver, picture_10x10[0].pict, 0,
> win->pict, 5, 11, 0, 0, 0, 0, 40, 40);
>
.@movial.com]
Sent: 2010?7?10? 0:34
To: Huang, FrankR
Cc: xorg-driver-ge...@lists.x.org; xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Subject: RE: [Xorg-driver-geode] Rendering in geode
> > If Repeat is Normal (1), then the coordinate is wrapped back into
> > the image using the modulus (%) operation. This is
> > If Repeat is Normal (1), then the coordinate is wrapped back into
> > the image using the modulus (%) operation. This is your usual
> > repeating tile function. As a special case, a 1x1 image with Repeat
> > set to Normal is the usual way of representing a solid colour.
>
> I found that the
?6?14? 18:07
To: Huang, FrankR
Cc: xorg-driver-ge...@lists.x.org; xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Subject: Re: [Xorg-driver-geode] Rendering in geode
On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 16:47 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote:
> You know when the driver does the composite, it is called in
> exaTryDriverCom
@lists.x.org
Subject: RE: [Xorg-driver-geode] Rendering in geode
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 17:21 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote:
> You know if the screen resolution is 1280x1024, and the first pass
> result of PictOpOver need maximum 1280x1024x4(ARGB) size. But if
> our driver's framebuffer is not b
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 17:21 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote:
> You know if the screen resolution is 1280x1024, and the first pass
> result of PictOpOver need maximum 1280x1024x4(ARGB) size. But if
> our driver's framebuffer is not big enough, how do we do that?
You could do it scanline by scanline
river-ge...@lists.x.org; xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Subject: Re: [Xorg-driver-geode] Rendering in geode
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 17:21 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote:
> The reason I use 4*PITCH is that the src is A8 picture, and the src'
> format is ARGB32, so it is 4*PITCH. I don't know if th
river-geode-bounces+frankr.huang=amd@lists.x.org
[mailto:xorg-driver-geode-bounces+frankr.huang=amd@lists.x.org] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Morton
Sent: 2010?6?24? 20:03
To: Huang, FrankR
Cc: xorg-driver-ge...@lists.x.org; xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Subject: Re: [Xorg-driver-geode] Rendering in geod
han Morton; mic...@daenzer.net; Matt Dew;
xorg-devel@lists.x.org
Subject: Re: [Xorg-driver-geode] Rendering in geode
On Mon, Jun 28 2010, "Huang, FrankR" wrote:
> Jonathan and Danzer,
>
> Update:
>
> We change the FB size from 24MB to 32MB, the bug in firefox is
>
On Mon, Jun 28 2010, "Huang, FrankR" wrote:
> Jonathan and Danzer,
>
> Update:
>
> We change the FB size from 24MB to 32MB, the bug in firefox is
> disappearing. In my patch, I use the off-screen memory, so I
> suspect in some condition, this memory space is not enough or
14 matches
Mail list logo
