On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:21 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> 2009/8/5 Michel Dänzer :
> > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 01:39 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer :
> >> > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:54 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
> >>
2009/8/5 Michel Dänzer :
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 01:39 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer :
>> > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:54 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
>> >> > 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
Could you test patch 4 in combination with DRI2?
Maarten.
___
xorg-devel mailing list
xorg-devel@lists.x.org
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 01:39 -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer :
> > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:54 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
> >> > 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I wonder if maybe the slowdown
2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer :
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:54 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
>> > 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer
>> >
>> >
>> > I wonder if maybe the slowdown I'm seeing is because the
>> > radeon driver
>> > is
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:35 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 01:29 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> > 2009/8/4 Maarten Maathuis :
> > > I think glyphs are uploaded through UTS when possible, so that might
> > > just be it. In the case of driver pixmaps it would composite them from
>
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:54 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
> > 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer
> >
> >
> > I wonder if maybe the slowdown I'm seeing is because the
> > radeon driver
> > is temporarily lacking Uploa
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 00:04 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> I think glyphs are uploaded through UTS when possible, so that might
> just be it. In the case of driver pixmaps it would composite them from
> whatever driver pixmap you have iirc.
Right, but that should only matter between with/out you
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Joel Feiner wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
>> > 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer
>> >
>> >
>> > I wonder if maybe the slowdown I'm seeing is because the
>> >
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
> > 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer
> >
> >
> > I wonder if maybe the slowdown I'm seeing is because the
> > radeon driver
> > is temporarily lacking UploadToScreen
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:49 +0800, Joel Feiner wrote:
> 2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer
>
>
> I wonder if maybe the slowdown I'm seeing is because the
> radeon driver
> is temporarily lacking UploadToScreen and DownloadFromScreen
> hooks with
> KMS,
2009/8/4 Michel Dänzer
>
>
> I wonder if maybe the slowdown I'm seeing is because the radeon driver
> is temporarily lacking UploadToScreen and DownloadFromScreen hooks with
> KMS, though I'm not sure what those would be used for with text
> rendering.
>
Off-topic, but if I may enquire out of i
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 01:29 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> 2009/8/4 Maarten Maathuis :
> > I think glyphs are uploaded through UTS when possible, so that might
> > just be it. In the case of driver pixmaps it would composite them from
> > whatever driver pixmap you have iirc.
> >
> > I will make
2009/8/4 Maarten Maathuis :
> I think glyphs are uploaded through UTS when possible, so that might
> just be it. In the case of driver pixmaps it would composite them from
> whatever driver pixmap you have iirc.
>
> I will make another patch handling exaGetDriverPrivate more gracefully.
This seems
I think glyphs are uploaded through UTS when possible, so that might
just be it. In the case of driver pixmaps it would composite them from
whatever driver pixmap you have iirc.
I will make another patch handling exaGetDriverPrivate more gracefully.
Maarten.
__
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 20:09 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> 2009/8/3 Michel Dänzer :
> > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 18:56 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> >> There is one thing that did change, driver pixmaps are not allocated
> >> by default (only when exa deems acceleration doable). So for dri2
> >>
2009/8/3 Michel Dänzer :
> On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 18:56 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>> There is one thing that did change, driver pixmaps are not allocated
>> by default (only when exa deems acceleration doable). So for dri2
>> pixmaps you would need to create a scratch pixmap and attach a bo
>>
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 18:56 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> There is one thing that did change, driver pixmaps are not allocated
> by default (only when exa deems acceleration doable). So for dri2
> pixmaps you would need to create a scratch pixmap and attach a bo
> afterwards.
That doesn't sound
There is one thing that did change, driver pixmaps are not allocated
by default (only when exa deems acceleration doable). So for dri2
pixmaps you would need to create a scratch pixmap and attach a bo
afterwards. I suspect this is the issue.
About the performance, i didn't notice that, but we (nou
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 16:47 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> These patches split off some exa code into more readable seperate
> files. And a 3rd implementation is added, which brings trapezoids
> back to reasonable performance for me (=nouveau driver pixmaps). It's
> completely transparent for th
20 matches
Mail list logo
