On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 23:14 +0100, Simon Thum wrote:
> I think it's better to go with a lower default, and if people have a
> need they can reduce to zero if they like. I have attached a patch which
> provides some more rationale.
Thanks.. I'll give this a test when I get a moment. (Please remind
On 11/23/2011 12:47 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 03:19 PM, Simon Thum wrote:
>> Before I forget, it's possible (in theory) for the kernel to supply
>> "fuzz" values, but I haven't seen that in practical use. Those could
>> make it into your property, but I suspect that is what happens.
On 11/22/2011 03:19 PM, Simon Thum wrote:
> Hi Peter(s),
>
> the story behind the default noise cancellation is that I chose what
> worked well on my system (25) and figured out a reasonable fraction of
> the diagonal that approximately gave me that number (0.5%; see
> set_default_parameters).
>
Hi Peter(s),
the story behind the default noise cancellation is that I chose what
worked well on my system (25) and figured out a reasonable fraction of
the diagonal that approximately gave me that number (0.5%; see
set_default_parameters).
"My system" refers to an old HW I no longer have in acti
Hi guys,
Recently I've been having some difficulties with my touchpad. I do a lot
of electronics design work, and this often requires making small precise
movements with the pointer.
Just recently though, this has been much harder - I've found myself
getting frustrated with the CAD package, and I
