On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:20:04 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 11:13 -1000, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:59:35 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Yeah, it's not really something I want Linux to default to using either.
I mean, we're
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 11:13 -1000, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:59:35 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Yeah, it's not really something I want Linux to default to using either.
I mean, we're going to want input threads, so slicing off librt just
because it pulls in
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:59:35 -0400, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 11:02 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
Some systems might not want to link against rt and pthread libraries
simply to
implement monotonic clock, inside GetTimeInMillis().
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 11:02 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
Some systems might not want to link against rt and pthread libraries simply
to
implement monotonic clock, inside GetTimeInMillis(). For those, use a direct
syscall instead.
This patch keeps the new
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
Some systems might not want to link against rt and pthread libraries simply to
implement monotonic clock, inside GetTimeInMillis(). For those, use a direct
syscall instead.
This patch keeps the new syscall version disabled by default - therefore not
changing the
